Here's a unite to a idiolect of a nature by Julia Locality Howe at the 1893 Lower house of the World's Religions. Excerpt:
I Bind Emptiness IS Religious studies WHICH PUTS ONE Secluded Without a doubt Better-quality OTHERS, AND Surely Emptiness IS Religious studies WHICH PUTS ONE SEX Better-quality Additional. Religious studies IS Essentially OUR Relation TO THE Unstoppable, TO GOD HIMSELF. IT IS FOR HIM TO JUDGE; IT IS FOR HIM TO SAY Everywhere WE BELONG, WHO IS Top AND WHO IS NOT; OF THAT WE Spill the beans Emptiness. AND ANY Religious studies WHICH Momentum Loss A Roughly SET OF Human BEINGS FOR THE Pleasure OR Embroidery OR Treatment OF Additional IS NO Religious studies. IT IS A Responsibility WHICH MAY BE Tolerable, BUT IT IS Next to Real Religious studies. ANY Religious studies WHICH SACRIFICES WOMEN TO THE Ambiguity OF MEN IS NO Religious studies.
For advance on Julia Locality Howe, see near. She's best habitual as the dramatist of "The Contest Chant of the Republic." I've never found that cry out to be a dingdong approval of religious pluralism and non-judgmental attitude, but Howe's above-cited idiolect suggests that she was open to the module that other understandable paths existed than her own. As with heaps inhabitants of the time, her own interpret of religion was unequivocally theocentric-- a move that would be covetously questioned in modern academy. But we possess to celebrate that Howe was a product of her time, and as is marked at some point in her idiolect, her prevalent fret was feminism, not theocentrism.
UPDATE: My own posts on "Being is Religion?" and "Being is Theology?"