From RORATE CAELI:
CENTENNIAL"NOTRE CHARGE APOSTOLIQUE"
THE CHURCH DOES NOT HAVE TO FREE HERSELF FROM HER PAST
On the feast of Saint Louis, King of France, 1910, exactly one hundred years ago, Pope Saint Pius X signed one of the most remarkable documents of his struggle against Modernism: "Notre Charge Apostolique", a letter addressed "to the Archbishops and Bishops of France", on the grave matter of the movement known as the "Sillon"["en francais"; in English]. Nearly three years after "Pascendi", Saint Pius X alerted the Bishops of France to another grave consequence of a lay Catholic movement out of control.
It is a letter which must be carefuly read, and in its entirety, by all Catholics of our age. The errors of the Sillon are the same so prevalent in these post-Conciliar time. In our previous post, we presented what the Sillon was and how it came to be. Today, we present its errors, and the great lessons of Pope Sarto for all Catholics.
"ON CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATIONWe know well that they flatter themselves with the idea of raising human dignity and the discredited condition of the working class. We know that they wish to render just and perfect the labor laws and the relations between employers and employees, thus causing a more complete justice and a greater measure of charity to prevail upon earth, and causing also a profound and fruitful transformation in society by which mankind would make an undreamed-of progress. Certainly, We do not blame these efforts; they would be excellent in every respect if the Sillonist did not forget that a person's progress consists in developing his natural abilities by fresh motivations; that it consists also in permitting these motivations to operate within the frame of, and in conformity with, the laws of human nature. But, on the contrary, by ignoring the laws governing human nature and by breaking the bounds within which they operate, the human person is lead, not toward progress, but towards death. This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.
No, Venerable Brethren, WE MUST REPEAT WITH THE UTMOST ENERGY IN THESE TIMES OF SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL ANARCHY WHEN EVERYONE TAKES IT UPON HIMSELF TO TEACH AS A TEACHER AND LAWMAKER - THE CITY CANNOT BE BUILT OTHERWISE THAN AS GOD HAS BUILT IT; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; IT HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE AND STILL IS: IT IS CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION, IT IS THE CATHOLIC CITY. IT HAS ONLY TO BE SET UP AND RESTORED CONTINUALLY AGAINST THE UNREMITTING ATTACKS OF INSANE DREAMERS, REBELS AND MISCREANTS....ON EQUALITY[T]HE SILLON SAYS THAT IT IS STRIVING TO ESTABLISH AN ERA OF EQUALITY WHICH, BY THAT VERY FACT, WOULD BE ALSO AN ERA OF GREATER JUSTICE. THUS, TO THE SILLON, EVERY INEQUALITY OF CONDITION IS AN INJUSTICE, OR AT LEAST, A DIMINUTION OF JUSTICE? HERE WE HAVE A PRINCIPLE THAT CONFLICTS SHARPLY WITH THE NATURE OF THINGS, A PRINCIPLE CONDUCIVE TO JEALOUSLY, INJUSTICE, AND SUBVERSIVE TO ANY SOCIAL ORDER. THUS, DEMOCRACY ALONE WILL BRING ABOUT THE REIGN OF PERFECT JUSTICE! IS THIS NOT AN INSULT TO OTHER FORMS OF GOVERNMENT WHICH ARE THEREBY DEBASED TO THE LEVEL OF STERILE MAKESHIFTS?...ON FRATERNITYCATHOLIC DOCTRINE TELLS US THAT THE PRIMARY DUTY OF CHARITY DOES NOT LIE IN THE TOLERATION OF FALSE IDEAS, HOWEVER SINCERE THEY MAY BE, NOR IN THE THEORETICAL OR PRACTICAL INDIFFERENCE TOWARDS THE ERRORS AND VICES IN WHICH WE SEE OUR BRETHREN PLUNGED, BUT IN THE ZEAL FOR THEIR INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL IMPROVEMENT AS WELL AS FOR THEIR MATERIAL WELL-BEING. Catholic doctrine further tells us that LOVE FOR OUR NEIGHBOR FLOWS FROM OUR LOVE FOR GOD, Who is Father to all, and goal of the whole human family; and in Jesus Christ whose members we are, to the point that in doing good to others we are doing good to Jesus Christ Himself. ANY OTHER KIND OF LOVE IS SHEER ILLUSION, STERILE AND FLEETING.
Indeed, we have the human experience of pagan and secular societies of ages past to show that concern for common interests or affinities of nature weigh very little against the passions and wild desires of the heart. No, Venerable Brethren, THERE IS NO GENUINE FRATERNITY OUTSIDE CHRISTIAN CHARITY. Through the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ Our Saviour, Christian charity embraces all men, comforts all, and leads all to the same faith and same heavenly happiness.
BY SEPARATING FRATERNITY FROM CHRISTIAN CHARITY THUS UNDERSTOOD, DEMOCRACY, FAR FROM BEING A PROGRESS, WOULD MEAN A DISASTROUS STEP BACKWARDS FOR CIVILIZATION. If, as We desire with all Our heart, the highest possible peak of wellbeing for society and its members is to be attained through fraternity or, as it is also called, universal solidarity, all minds must be united in the knowledge of Truth, all wills united in morality, and all hearts in the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ. But THIS UNION IS ATTAINABLE ONLY BY CATHOLIC CHARITY, AND THAT IS WHY CATHOLIC CHARITY ALONE CAN LEAD THE PEOPLE IN THE MARCH OF PROGRESS TOWARDS THE IDEAL CIVILIZATION....ON HUMAN DIGNITY
[A]T THE ROOT OF ALL THEIR FALLACIES ON SOCIAL QUESTIONS, LIE THE FALSE HOPES OF SILLONISTS ON HUMAN DIGNITY. ACCORDING TO THEM, MAN WILL BE A MAN TRULY WORTHY OF THE NAME ONLY WHEN HE HAS ACQUIRED A STRONG, ENLIGHTENED, AND INDEPENDENT CONSCIOUSNESS, ABLE TO DO WITHOUT A MASTER, OBEYING ONLY HIMSELF, AND ABLE TO ASSUME THE MOST DEMANDING RESPONSIBILITIES WITHOUT FALTERING. SUCH ARE THE BIG WORDS BY WHICH HUMAN PRIDE IS EXALTED, LIKE A DREAM CARRYING MAN AWAY WITHOUT LIGHT, WITHOUT GUIDANCE, AND WITHOUT HELP into the realm of illusion in which he will be destroyed by his errors and passions whilst awaiting the glorious day of his full consciousness. And that great day, when will it come? Unless human nature can be changed, which is not within the power of the Sillonists, will that day ever come? DID THE SAINTS WHO BROUGHT HUMAN DIGNITY TO ITS HIGHEST POINT, POSSESS THAT KIND OF DIGNITY? AND WHAT OF THE LOWLY OF THIS EARTH WHO ARE UNABLE TO RAISE SO HIGH BUT ARE CONTENT TO PLOW THEIR FURROW MODESTLY AT THE LEVEL WHERE PROVIDENCE PLACED THEM? THEY WHO ARE DILIGENTLY DISCHARGING THEIR DUTIES WITH CHRISTIAN HUMILITY, OBEDIENCE, AND PATIENCE, ARE THEY NOT ALSO WORTHY OF BEING CALLED MEN? WILL NOT OUR LORD TAKE THEM ONE DAY OUT OF THEIR OBSCURITY AND PLACE THEM IN HEAVEN AMONGST THE PRINCES OF HIS PEOPLE?...DISTRUST OF THE CHURCH:
DISTRUST OF THE CHURCH, THEIR MOTHER, IS BEING INSTILLED INTO THE MINDS OF CATHOLIC YOUTH; THEY ARE BEING TAUGHT THAT AFTER NINETEEN CENTURIES SHE HAS NOT YET BEEN ABLE TO BUILD UP IN THIS WORLD A SOCIETY ON TRUE FOUNDATIONS; SHE HAS NOT UNDERSTOOD THE SOCIAL NOTIONS OF AUTHORITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY AND HUMAN DIGNITY; THEY ARE TOLD THAT THE GREAT BISHOPS AND KINGS, WHO HAVE MADE FRANCE WHAT IT IS AND GOVERNED IT SO GLORIOUSLY, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GIVE THEIR PEOPLE TRUE JUSTICE AND TRUE HAPPINESS because they did not possess the Sillonist Ideal!...CHURCH AND POLITICS
WE DO NOT HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE HERE THAT THE ADVENT OF UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY IS OF NO CONCERN TO THE ACTION OF THE CHURCH IN THE WORLD; WE HAVE ALREADY RECALLED THAT THE CHURCH HAS ALWAYS LEFT TO THE NATIONS THE CARE OF GIVING THEMSELVES THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WHICH THEY THINK MOST SUITED TO THEIR NEEDS. What We wish to affirm once again, after Our Predecessor, is that IT IS AN ERROR AND A DANGER TO BIND DOWN CATHOLICISM BY PRINCIPLE TO A PARTICULAR FORM OF GOVERNMENT. THIS ERROR AND THIS DANGER ARE ALL THE GREATER WHEN RELIGION IS ASSOCIATED WITH A KIND OF DEMOCRACY WHOSE DOCTRINES ARE FALSE. But this is what the Sillon is doing. For the sake of a particular political form, it compromises the Church, it sows division among Catholics, snatches away young people and even priests and seminarists from purely Catholic action, and is wasting away as a dead loss part of the living forces of the nation.
And, behold, Venerable Brethren, an astounding contradiction: It is precisely because religion ought to transcend all parties, and it is in appealing to this principle, that the Sillon abstains from defending the beleaguered Church. CERTAINLY, IT IS NOT THE CHURCH THAT HAS GONE INTO THE POLITICAL ARENA: THEY HAVE DRAGGED HERE THERE TO MUTILATE AND TO DESPOIL HER. IS IT NOT THE DUTY OF EVERY CATHOLIC, THEN, TO USE THE POLITICAL WEAPONS WHICH HE HOLDS, TO DEFEND HER?...
POLITICS AND RELIGIOUS PROMISCUITY
THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE SILLON, AS SUCH, WAS TRULY CATHOLIC. IT RECOGNIZED BUT ONE MORAL FORCE - CATHOLICISM; AND THE SILLONISTS WERE WONT TO PROCLAIM THAT DEMOCRACY WOULD HAVE TO BE CATHOLIC OR WOULD NOT EXIST AT ALL. A TIME CAME WHEN THEY CHANGED THEIR MINDS. THEY LEFT TO EACH ONE HIS RELIGION OR HIS PHILOSOPHY. THEY CEASED TO CALL THEMSELVES CATHOLICS AND, FOR THE FORMULA "DEMOCRACY WILL BE CATHOLIC" THEY SUBSTITUTED "DEMOCRACY WILL NOT BE ANTI-CATHOLIC", ANY MORE THAN IT WILL BE ANTI-JEWISH OR ANTI-BUDDHIST.... Thus, a host of new groups, Catholic, Protestant, Free-Thinking, now apparently autonomous, are invited to set to work: "Catholic comrades will work between themselves in a special organization and will learn and educate themselves. Protestant and Free-Thinking Democrats will do likewise on their own side. But all of us, Catholics, Protestants and Free-Thinkers will have at heart to arm young people, not in view of the fratricidal struggle, but in view of a disinterested emulation in the field of social and civic virtues."
HERE WE HAVE, FOUNDED BY CATHOLICS, AN INTER-DENOMINATIONAL ASSOCIATION THAT IS TO WORK FOR THE REFORM OF CIVILIZATION, AN UNDERTAKING WHICH IS ABOVE ALL RELIGIOUS IN CHARACTER; FOR THERE IS NO TRUE CIVILIZATION WITHOUT A MORAL CIVILIZATION, AND NO TRUE MORAL CIVILIZATION WITHOUT THE TRUE RELIGION: IT IS A PROVEN TRUTH, A HISTORICAL FACT. The new Sillonists cannot pretend that they are merely working on "the ground of practical realities" where differences of belief do not matter. Their leader is so conscious of the influence which the convictions of the mind have upon the result of the action, that he invites them, whatever religion they may belong to, "to provide on the ground of practical realities, the proof of the excellence of their personal convictions." And with good reason: indeed, ALL PRACTICAL RESULTS REFLECT THE NATURE OF ONES RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS, JUST AS THE LIMBS OF A MAN DOWN TO HIS FINGER-TIPS, OWE THEIR VERY SHAPE TO THE PRINCIPLE OF LIFE THAT DWELLS IN HIS BODY....This being said, what must be thought of the promiscuity in which young Catholics will be caught up with heterodox and unbelieving folk in a work of this nature? Is it not a thousand-fold more dangerous for them than a neutral association? What are we to think of this appeal to all the heterodox, and to all the unbelievers, to prove the excellence of their convictions in the social sphere in a sort of apologetic contest? Has not this contest lasted for nineteen centuries in conditions less dangerous for the faith of Catholics? And was it not all to the credit of the Catholic Church? WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF THIS RESPECT FOR ALL ERRORS, AND OF THIS STRANGE INVITATION MADE BY A CATHOLIC TO ALL THE DISSIDENTS TO STRENGTHEN THEIR CONVICTIONS THROUGH STUDY SO THAT THEY MAY HAVE MORE AND MORE ABUNDANT SOURCES OF FRESH FORCES? WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF AN ASSOCIATION IN WHICH ALL RELIGIONS AND EVEN FREE-THOUGHT MAY EXPRESS THEMSELVES OPENLY AND IN COMPLETE FREEDOM? For the Sillonists who, in public lectures and elsewhere, proudly proclaim their personal faith, certainly do not intend to silence others nor do they intend to prevent a Protestant from asserting his Protestantism, and the skeptic from affirming his skepticism. Finally, WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF A CATHOLIC WHO, ON ENTERING HIS STUDY GROUP, LEAVES HIS CATHOLICISM OUTSIDE THE DOOR so as not to alarm his comrades who, "dreaming of disinterested social action, are not inclined to make it serve the triumph of interests, coteries and even convictions whatever they may be"?...
THE GOAL OF HUMANISTIC DEMOCRACY: A NEW UNIVERSAL RELIGION
WHEN WE CONSIDER THE FORCES, KNOWLEDGE, AND SUPERNATURAL VIRTUES WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THE CHRISTIAN CITY, and the sufferings of millions of martyrs, and the light given by the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and the self-sacrifice of all the heroes of charity, and a powerful hierarchy ordained in heaven, and the streams of Divine Grace - the whole having been built up, bound together, and impregnated by the life and spirit of Jesus Christ, the Wisdom of God, the Word made man - when we think, I say, of all this, iT IS FRIGHTENING TO BEHOLD NEW APOSTLES EAGERLY ATTEMPTING TO DO BETTER BY A COMMON INTERCHANGE OF VAGUE IDEALISM AND CIVIC VIRTUES. WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO PRODUCE? WHAT IS TO COME OF THIS COLLABORATION? A mere VERBAL AND CHIMERICAL CONSTRUCTION IN WHICH WE SHALL SEE, GLOWING IN A JUMBLE, AND IN SEDUCTIVE CONFUSION, THE WORDS LIBERTY, JUSTICE, FRATERNITY, LOVE, EQUALITY, AND HUMAN EXULTATION, ALL RESTING UPON AN ILL-UNDERSTOOD HUMAN DIGNITY. It will be A TUMULTUOUS AGITATION, STERILE FOR THE END PROPOSED, BUT WHICH WILL BENEFIT THE LESS UTOPIAN EXPLOITERS OF THE PEOPLE. Yes, we can truly say that THE SILLON, ITS EYES FIXED ON A CHIMERA, BRINGS SOCIALISM IN ITS TRAIN.
We fear that worse is to come: THE END RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPING PROMISCUOUSNESS, THE BENEFICIARY OF THIS COSMOPOLITAN SOCIAL ACTION, CAN ONLY BE A DEMOCRACY WHICH WILL BE NEITHER CATHOLIC, NOR PROTESTANT, NOR JEWISH. IT WILL BE A RELIGION (for Sillonism, so the leaders have said, is a religion) MORE UNIVERSAL THAN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, UNITING ALL MEN BECOME BROTHERS AND COMRADES at last in the "Kingdom of God". - "WE DO NOT WORK FOR THE CHURCH, WE WORK FOR MANKIND."
CHRIST: GENTLE AND STRONG
AS SOON AS THE SOCIAL QUESTION IS BEING APPROACHED, IT IS THE FASHION IN SOME QUARTERS TO FIRST PUT ASIDE THE DIVINITY OF JESUS CHRIST, AND THEN TO MENTION ONLY HIS UNLIMITED CLEMENCY, HIS COMPASSION FOR ALL HUMAN MISERIES, AND HIS PRESSING EXHORTATIONS TO THE LOVE OF OUR NEIGHBOR AND TO THE BROTHERHOOD OF MEN. True, Jesus has loved us with an immense, infinite love, and He came on earth to suffer and die so that, gathered around Him in justice and love, motivated by the same sentiments of mutual charity, all men might live in peace and happiness. But FOR THE REALIZATION OF THIS TEMPORAL AND ETERNAL HAPPINESS, HE HAS LAID DOWN WITH SUPREME AUTHORITY THE CONDITION THAT WE MUST BELONG TO HIS FLOCK, THAT WE MUST ACCEPT HIS DOCTRINE, THAT WE MUST PRACTICE VIRTUE, AND THAT WE MUST ACCEPT THE TEACHING AND GUIDANCE OF PETER AND HIS SUCCESSORS. FURTHER, WHILST JESUS WAS KIND TO SINNERS AND TO THOSE WHO WENT ASTRAY, HE DID NOT RESPECT THEIR FALSE IDEAS, however sincere they might have appeared. HE LOVED THEM ALL, BUT HE INSTRUCTED THEM IN ORDER TO CONVERT THEM AND SAVE THEM. Whilst He called to Himself in order to comfort them, those who toiled and suffered, it was not to preach to them the jealousy of a chimerical equality. Whilst He lifted up the lowly, it was not to instill in them the sentiment of a dignity independent from, and rebellious against, the duty of obedience. Whilst His heart overflowed with gentleness for the souls of good-will, He could also arm Himself with holy indignation against the profaners of the House of God, against the wretched men who scandalized the little ones, against the authorities who crush the people with the weight of heavy burdens without putting out a hand to lift them. HE WAS AS STRONG AS HE WAS GENTLE. HE REPROVED, THREATENED, CHASTISED, KNOWING, AND TEACHING US THAT FEAR IS THE BEGINNING OF WISDOM, AND THAT IT IS SOMETIMES PROPER FOR A MAN TO CUT OFF AN OFFENDING LIMB TO SAVE HIS BODY. Finally, He did not announce for future society the reign of an ideal happiness from which suffering would be banished; but, by His lessons and by His example, He traced THE PATH OF THE HAPPINESS which is possible on earth and of the perfect happiness in heaven: THE ROYAL WAY OF THE CROSS. These are teachings that it would be wrong to apply only to one's personal life in order to win eternal salvation; these are eminently social teachings, and they show in Our Lord Jesus Christ SOMETHING QUITE DIFFERENT FROM AN INCONSISTENT AND IMPOTENT HUMANITARIANISM.
THE TRUE FRIENDS OF THE PEOPLE ARE TRADITIONALISTSMOREOVER, SINCE IN THE CLASH OF INTERESTS, AND ESPECIALLY IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST DISHONEST FORCES, THE VIRTUE OF MAN, AND EVEN HIS HOLINESS ARE NOT ALWAYS SUFFICIENT TO GUARANTEE HIM HIS DAILY BREAD, AND SINCE SOCIAL STRUCTURES, THROUGH THEIR NATURAL INTERPLAY, OUGHT TO BE DEVISED TO THWART THE EFFORTS OF THE UNSCRUPULOUS AND ENABLE ALL MEN OF GOOD WILL TO ATTAIN THEIR LEGITIMATE SHARE OF TEMPORAL HAPPINESS, WE EARNESTLY DESIRE THAT YOU SHOULD TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN THE ORGANIZATION OF SOCIETY WITH THIS OBJECTIVE IN MIND. AND, TO THIS END, WHILST YOUR PRIESTS WILL ZEALOUSLY DEVOTE EFFORTS TO THE SANCTIFICATION OF SOULS, TO THE DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH, AND ALSO TO WORKS OF CHARITY IN THE STRICT SENSE, YOU SHALL SELECT A FEW OF THEM, LEVEL-HEADED AND OF ACTIVE DISPOSITION, HOLDERS OF DOCTORS DEGREES IN PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY, THOROUGHLY ACQUAINTED WITH THE HISTORY OF ANCIENT AND MODERN CIVILIZATIONS, AND YOU SHALL SET THEM TO THE NOT-SO-LOFTY BUT MORE PRACTICAL STUDY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCE SO THAT YOU MAY PLACE THEM AT THE OPPORTUNE TIME AT THE HELM OF YOUR WORKS OF CATHOLIC ACTION. HOWEVER, LET NOT THESE PRIESTS BE MISLED, IN THE MAZE OF CURRENT OPINIONS, BY THE MIRACLES OF A FALSE DEMOCRACY. LET THEM NOT BORROW FROM THE RHETORIC OF THE WORST ENEMIES OF THE CHURCH AND OF THE PEOPLE, THE HIGH-FLOWN PHRASES, FULL OF PROMISES; WHICH ARE AS HIGH-SOUNDING AS UNATTAINABLE. LET THEM BE CONVINCED THAT THE SOCIAL QUESTION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE DID NOT ARISE ONLY YESTERDAY; THAT THE CHURCH AND THE STATE, AT ALL TIMES AND IN HAPPY CONCERT, HAVE RAISED UP FRUITFUL ORGANIZATIONS TO THIS END; THAT THE CHURCH, which has never betrayed the happiness of the people by consenting to dubious alliances, DOES NOT HAVE TO FREE HERSELF FROM THE PAST; that all that is needed is to take up again, with the help of the true workers for a social restoration, the organisms which the Revolution shattered, and to adapt them, in the same Christian spirit that inspired them, to the new environment arising from the material development of today's society. INDEED, THE TRUE FRIENDS OF THE PEOPLE ARE NEITHER REVOLUTIONARIES, NOR INNOVATORS: THEY ARE TRADITIONALISTS.
