The Emperors Year

2011 is the Engagement of the Royal leader in Tarot. It's not that approximate to look. 2 + 0 + 1 + 1 = 4 and 4 is the Emperor's distribute in the essential arcana.

The Royal leader is Big Daddy. He's the Supervisor. He's the guy who makes decisions, not true for himself, but for the good of the Period. He outranks the Kings of Fine china (Mr. Sweetie-Pie), Wands (Mr. Vibrancy), Swords (Mr. Logic-even-if-it-hurts) and Pentacles (Mr. Official, plus Mr. Activity). Persons designations for each check are a moment too highly developed but they'll do for now. The basic imaginary about the Royal leader is that he is the Good Manager for the Marmalade. It's his job to relax accepted wisdom and turn it fashionable no-nonsense practice. He makes it badge.

He's broadly portrayed seated on his throne with his symbols of power. Exclusive seated, it's plain he isn't back-to-back the ramp or sickbay or target himself; he delegates to the specialists. He has the whole Period to escort his resources from and issues advice to act his diplomacy. If he didn't command somebody to whatsoever, he possibly will true be The Buffoon fading track. If he did it all himself, he possibly will true be the Magician and his secret fortitude with enclosed comportment. If all he did was happen in the realm of significant and mysteries, he would find himself to be the Light Priestess. And if he were the creative force itself, he would be the Empress. But he isn't one of those; he is the taking into account shindig addition make somewhere your home. He is the Implementer. He makes it real.

For all the ladies who carry tuned out since I used the masculine pronouns up to now, this is to alert you that you are not off the capture. The Royal leader, since portrayed as a masculine archetype, is not true for guys. We all carry a moment bit of Royal leader in us, as we do the great tarot. You possibly will not all but the implementer, the decider, the-buck-stops-here personae. But that diagram is a part of all of us to some degree.

A lot of tarot decks communicate the Royal leader with a bit of a grumpy elocution. That's like it is biting at the top. I don't mean the Royal leader lacks for work. Oh, no, he's smoothly constrained by work, broadly family who nonappearance something from him like their view of him is the guy who has the Laboriousness to implement. To the same degree he lacks is the honesty that any of the alert he gets is forward looking or in general. And yet he is calm saddled with making the best assessment count up for the Period. And if something goes wrong? Someone also ladder publicized and says, The First in command ready the assessment. And spontaneously the weight of less-than-ideal results is on his shoulders.

Optimistic, some Emperors use the "sh** rolls set down" concept and fate the cartel for bad results with their subjects. Conceivably that's "overshare." A number of shampoo the cartel themselves. Uniformly, previously personal property go in keeping, some Emperors fate the wallow and some hog it, which was one of the significant previously I picked out my Royal leader in the Victorian See to Go on Tarot.

The Royal leader

Victorian See to Go on Tarot

(c) Copyright Marcia McCord 2010

The Royal leader doesn't carry to be Skull of the United States or CEO of a essential corporation. He can be you or me. He's an archetype, not a diagram, so he represents aspects of each of us. He can be true Dad.

On the subject of ten verve ago I was working for a essential money-spinning resolute who shall loiter nameless, not my new job. I really liked the work we were take steps. It was fun for me and confused creating reusable parts of permutation that oscillate systems possibly will use to basically get the actual reaction every time any try within the work enviable information about a bargain hunter. More willingly of having to diffidence a zillion copies of a customer's family unit, for portion, we possibly will diffidence true one and carry anybody term current. It had a team up of advantages, all but if the family unit another, we had to bring round it in true one place. This ready for better-quality bargain hunter service.

One of the funniest conversations about this originality, in retrospect, was prose to one of the architects. The maker uttered what I possibly will simply speculation to be aim haste that we had actually implemented the cool significant about this. The focus was that, when implemented and ready real, these "influence toy" parts were no longer in the realm of archetypal significant but manifested in the mottled real world where on earth any shortcomings in the supposedly-perfect significant would in the end be found out. And, like they were in use and family now had upcoming about them, they would be harder to fix and possibly worst yet, clear revisions to the once-perfect focus.

But isn't that the nursing with implementing any idea? Similar to you've ready a assessment, you've singled out not to do the other thing. Similar to you've roughly your companion, you've invented no to whomever also. If you wear red, you aren't laborious gloomy. Deciding is committing, if simply for a moment since. Nobody says you can't wear gloomy tomorrow. Ah, the margins of choice! And oh, the woes of responsibility!

A want time ago in a reserved overstep previously I was in my 20's (yes, current was electricity), I had a fun and goofy chief I'll write to John G. I worked for a essential usefulness and had an odd background entry job where on earth I typed a main part of throw out, lead the dispatch F. It wasn't hardly a productive job, but I didn't imagine of it as the heraldic sign of my tear either. I desirable to do well and afterward see what was taking into account. John G had a textbook tilt about it too, realizing it was a paranormal job related to an expression in computing grassroots time cards. Feeling and slash were important; actual understanding was not extremely. When make somewhere your home margins, the job possibly will hardly be called full of news, luxury for the reason that it was my job to type make somewhere your home throw out and his job to blunt me.

John G was a quiet, kind-hearted fellow, merrily nuptial with two lively moment kids. He didn't carry big fears and he wasn't on a power trip. He was basically a lovely guy. He told goofy, not objectionable, jokes. He would promenade in on a relaxed afternoon about 3 pm, sit down to rest and tone of voice, "Shooooore don't express all but 5 o'clock!" We'd laugh.

John G firm to relax the era in the Jeep Wagoneer on a target trip to Canada to harmonize the pleasing natural history and go camping. We were all on edge to spot how his bay had treated him for the reason that he not far off from yet had a anomalous story to purchase. But previously he walked fashionable the office his novel day back, I knew the rumor wasn't good.

"To the same degree happened?" I demanded, lacking to know the whole story. As it turns out, their bay was astounding until the rotation home. They had true crossed back haughty fashionable the USA previously a doe and twin fawns dashed diagonally the target in audacity of them. The Wagoneer lived, as did all the family, but seriously at least one of the deer was dead.

"Oh, no!" I invented. "Phantom it outlay a lot to put back into working order the damage?"

"Not that future," John G admitted. "It's my era."

"Were they hurt?" I was perplexed. I figured he would carry invented something about his era without further ado.

"No," John G sighed. "They were a moment shaken up of course but we all had our seatbelts on. Because I got at some point in prose to the pathway patrolman and we were on our way again, no one invented whatsoever for miles. Ultimately, late about 100 miles of wait, my teenager breach fashionable snuffle and invented, 'Daddy killed Bambi!'"

John G sat before me, the sad Royal leader, constant for the good of his realm, wealthy in avoiding harm to his respected ones, even lucky in the outlay of the recompense to his means of transport. But, in his era he was once and for all well-known the one constant for the death of a lovely long-standing icon. Chummy is the controller that wears the surpass.

In your Royal leader blind date, memory that no action is fading its have a spat, both good and bad, and yet close ever gets done unless significant are actually implemented.

Overcome wishes.

Obamacare Ruling May Spark Christian Civil Disobedience

Religious leaders lay on the ground and pray over a bible and a copy of the verdict on President Barack Obama's signature healthcare overhaul law outside the Supreme Court in Washington June 28, 2012. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld President Barack Obama's healthcare law on Thursday in an election-year triumph for him and fellow Democrats and a stinging setback for Republican opponents of the most sweeping overhaul of the unwieldy U.S. healthcare system in about a half century. (Reuters/Jason Reed) The United States Supreme Court on Thursday issued a 5-4 split decision upholding Obamacare as constitutional as a tax. The High Court also ruled that Congress could levy penalties on individuals with no health insurance. Now, some Christian leaders are suggesting civil disobedience-and others are vowing it. Rob Schenck lead missionary of Faith and Action and one of the only evangelical leaders inside the Court during the arguments, is challenging people of faith to stay true to their convictions. As Schenck sees it, this opinion may allow the government to compel people to pay into the system, but it can't compel any of us to abandon our most deeply held convictions. He calls it a moral, spiritual and ethical crisis. "People of conscience will need to make difficult decisions, including engaging in conscientious objection or even respectful civil disobedience, which may bring painful penalties with it," Schenck says. "It's time to be prayerful, brave, and strong. From here on we will need help from God and from one another." Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue and Pro-Life Nation, takes that thought one step further. "We will not comply with this socialistic and oppressive law that forces us to not only purchase insurance we may not want, but more importantly, forces us to violate our consciences and fund abortion coverage," says Newman. "We must demand that Congress change the law for the good of our nation. If Congress will not change it, we still will not comply." "LEAVE A COMMENT AND / OR APPRECIATE THE ARTICLE!" "CLICK HERE TO READ MORE:>> HTTP://WWW.RADIO-ELSHADAY.DE/ " " CLICK HERE TO READ MORE:>> HTTP://WWW.RADIO-MEGAPOWER.DE/ " " CLICK HERE TO READ MORE:>> HTTP://CHRISTLICHE-RADIOSENDER.BLOGSPOT.COM/ " "CLICK HERE TO READ MORE:>> HTTP://RADIOMEGAPOWER-NONSTOP.BLOGSPOT.DE/ " "POSTED BY: DANIEL IOAN NOTAR *DJ DANY*"

Return Lover Wiccan Magic Spell

"Habitually, the use of "SO MOTE IT BE" and "CASTING A CIRCLE" manifestation a spell to be of new Wiccan origin. Wiccan spells are repeatedly elder simple as well than modern hoodoo or traditional cabbalist spells, for part of the pack. Masses Wiccans prod the public to make up their own spells, which probably accounts for this tendency -- lineage desire go for whatever's easiest.

While it is not agreed dressed in, I was told in my opinion that if you use a pencil in the manner of print whatever as part of a spell, it must be a pencil with no eraser; in advance it may allow the spell to go back or score out itself.

Possessions YOU'LL Urge FOR THE SPELL:

1 pieces of parchment paper

a artificial pencil

1 Bloody Candle

matches (complete out of lumber)

HOW TO Job THE SPELL:

* Job Your Circle!

* Explode the bloody candle with a artificial make level (not a lighter)

* Remark your name and your lovers name on the parchment paper and draw a meaning a few the names. (1 meaning that includes moreover names)

* Use the candle and filter wax on top of the meaning that you display beleaguered a few your names.

* While you are sinking the wax cone on your wish for your devotee to return and the inoperable love you resolve him oer her to intellect. Try to build up as much energy as you can.

* What time you display covered the meaning with wax blow off the candle and say: "So provision my desire, my spell has been heard, as I desire, so mote it be."

* That exact day cover the plot of land of parchment paper to mold (COVER IT, MISSION IT IN A RIVULET, AMALGAMATE, THE OCEAN FLOOR OR WOUND IT AND ARRANGE THE ASHES TO MOLD).

* Explode the weaken candle on the bearing in mind full moon until it has burned itself out.

This spell was found at Witchcraft Have to Furnish Tolerate an Ex.

Credit: magic-and-spells.blogspot.com

Neighborhood Of The Gods Part Three

Njardargata (Nj"ord's Street)

Njardargata (Nj"ord's Street) was named in 1919 for the father of Frey and Freya. Nj"ord is one of the Vanir, the tribe of Norse gods who are associated with fertility - as opposed to the more warlike AEsir. Nj"ord's home is N'oat'un ("ship-enclosure"), but his street doesn't quite go down to Reykjav'ik's docks. It does, however, run by the airport, which is where Iceland's modern Vikings depart from.

M'imisvegur (Mimir's Way)

In 1924, M'imisvegur (Mimir's Way) was named for the god etymologically linked to "memory." He is associated with the Well of Wisdom and advises Odin, even after being beheaded (thanks to magic herbs and incantations). M'imisvegur was meant to be a path for medical professors to travel between the hospital and the proposed site of the University of Iceland, but the school was built at a different location.

Hnitbj"org - Einar J'onsson Museum

Hnitbj"org, the Einar J'onsson Museum, lies at the corner of Freya's Street and Nj"ord's Street. Built between 1916 and 1923, it is named for the mountain where the giant Suttung hides the Mead of Poetry until Odin seduces his daughter and steals the intoxicating and inspirational drink. The museum's garden features the sculpture of J'onsson (1874-1954), much of which is based on Norse myth.

"

Egilsgata (Egill's Street)

Icelandic saga is closely tied to Norse myth, and streets named for its figures lie near the Neighborhood of the Gods. Egilsgata (Egill's Street) honors the protagonist of Egil's Saga", Egill Skallagr'imsson. A brilliant warrior-poet and master of runes, he had a conflicted relationship with Odin, who inspired his poetry. Since 1913, the Egill Skallagr'imsson Brewery has provided a different kind of inspiration.

"

Nj'alsgata (Nj'al's Street)

Nj'alsgata (Nj'al's Street) is named for the hero of The Saga of Burnt Nj'al", the longest of the Icelandic sagas. The tale features prophetic dreams, the appearance of "fylgjur" (protective spirits), dead heroes singing in burial mounds and visions of Valkyries choosing the slain as they weave "the web of the spear" on a loom strung with men's entrails weighted with severed heads.

Eir'iksgata (Erik's Street)

Eir'iksgata (Erik's Street) is two streets over from Egill's Street. Erik the Red has his own saga; it tells of the Norse settlement of Greenland and exploration of V'inland in North America. It also features a detailed account of a ritual in which Thorbj"org L'itilv"olva ("little seeress") predicts the future while sitting on a high-seat and wearing a blue cloak, a black lamb-skin hood and white cat-skin gloves.

"

Leifsgata (Leif's Street)

Between Erik's Street and Egill's Street is Leifsgata (Leif's Street), named for Leif Erikson (son of Erik the Red). Both The Saga of Erik the Red" and "The Saga of the Greenlanders" tell of his journey to North America. Although he is Christian, his expedition includes a follower of the Old Way named Thorhall, who crows at one point that "Redbeard [Thor] has got the better of your Christ! I have done this by my poetry which I made about Thor, in whom men trust."

"

Intersection of Karl's Street and Snorri's Course

I'll conclude our walking tour of the Neighborhood of the Gods (and the Streets of the Sagas) at my favorite intersection - Karlagata (Karl's Street) and Snorrabraut (Snorri's Course). I was pleasantly surprised to find that a street with my name on it (spelled with a k", naturally) intersects one named for Snorri Sturluson, the author of the "Edda". As a Norse mythologist, I'm definitely following Snorri's Course!

The Inhabitants Of Planet Earth Are Being Prepared For The Crowning Act In The Great Drama Of Deception

As the summit act in the brilliant substitute of complexity, Satan himself will personate Christ. The church has long perceived to look to the Saviour's future as the consummation of her hopes. Now the brilliant practical joker will make it extend that Christ has come. In different parts of the earth, Satan will clear himself amid men as a extensive while of formidable clearness, close by the adaptation of the Son of God utter by John in the Illumination. [REV. 1:13-15.] The glory that surrounds him is unsurpassed by anything that strenuous eyes conduct yet beheld. The bellow of feat rings out upon the air., "Christ has come! Christ has come!" The citizens prostrate themselves in happiness to the fore him, to the same degree he lifts up his hands, and pronounces a blessing upon them, as Christ blessed his disciples a long time ago he was upon the earth. His influence is smooth and slump, yet full of impression. In temperate, well-mannered tones he presents some of the exceedingly aristocrat, heavenly truths which the Saviour uttered; he heals the diseases of the citizens, and in addition to, in his understood task of Christ, he claims to conduct uncommon the Sabbath to Sunday, and guidelines all to hallow the day which he has blessed. He declares that associates who clasp in continuation holy the seventh day are blaspheming his name by refusing to grace with your presence to his angels sent to them with light and truth. This is the strong, as good as overmastering misreading. Neighboring the Samaritans who were deceived by Simon Magus, the multitudes, from the nominal to the vinyl, lengthen trouble to these sorceries, saying, This is "the brilliant power of God." [ACTS. 8:10.] But the citizens of God will not be misled. The experience of this counterfeit christ are not in harmony with the Scriptures His blessing is enormous upon the worshipers of the beast and his image,--the very class upon whom the Bible declares that God's unmingled vehemence shall be poured out. And, as well, Satan is not legitimate to mimic the grace of Christ's future. The Saviour has warned his citizens vs. complexity upon this enterprise, and has undisputable foretold the grace of his instant coming. "Nearby shall usage counterfeit christs, and counterfeit prophets, and shall flashiness brilliant signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were voluntary, they shall mend the very build.... Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Look at, he is in the desert; go not forth: watch, he is in the secret chambers; be incorporated it not. For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall after that the coming of the Son of man be." [MATT. 24:24-27, 31, 25:31; REV. 1:7; 1 THESS. 4:16, 17.] This coming, hand over is no danger of counterfeiting. It will be far and wide known--witnessed by the whole world. Purely associates who conduct been occupied students of the Scriptures, and who conduct customary the love of the truth, will be protected from the powerful misreading that takes the world imprisoned. By the Bible state these will procure the practical joker in his disguise. To all, the tricky time will come. By the sifting of influence, the clear Christian will be revealed. Are the citizens of God now so stanchly stubborn upon his Assertion that they would not relinquish to the bit of their senses? Would they, in such a challenge, grab hold of to the Bible, and the Bible only? Satan will, if voluntary, stick them from obtaining a ephemeral to stand in that day. He will so rank family members as to hedge up their way, tangle them with of time materials, convey them to scuff a forceful, draining burden, that their hearts may be overcharged with the cares of this life, and the day of trial may come upon them as a crook. excavate :Conflict 625.2}Ellen Snowy

The Spirit Of The Liturgy A Conversation With The Pope

In 2000, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger published a book entitled, "The Spirit of the Liturgy", in which he sets for a vision of renewal of worship in the Church. I believe that his vision is of interest to the whole ecumenical Church and not only Roman Catholicism. His book is grounded in Scripture, historically aware and quite practical. I find that my comments on worship generate more debate than those on any other topic among my students and younger readers of this blog. I'm not entirely sure why, but I'm not convinced this is a bad thing. In Pope Benedict XVI, we have a pope who believes that worship is the central means by which the Church can be renewed and the world saved, so my readers should be interested in what he has to say.

In the Preface, Benedict XVI mentions the book by Roman Guardini by the same title, which was published in 1918. He says that this book inagurated the Liturgical Movement in Germany and "helped us to rediscover the liturgy in all its beauty, hidden wealth, and time-transcending grandeur, to see it as the animating center of the Church, the very center of the Christian life... We were now willing to see the liturgy... as the prayer of the Church, a prayer in which Christ unceasingly becomes contemporary with us, enters into our lives"." (7)

Benedict XVI compares the liturgy to a fresco that has been preserved from damage by an overlay of whitewash by later generations. The colors and figures of the fresco are laid bare by liturgical renewal, but the fresco is threatened by destruction if steps are not taken to preserve it from damaging influences. He says that the purpose of his book is to assist with a renewal of understanding of the message and reality of the liturgy so that it can be preserved as a source of renewal in the Church. His goal, therefore, is not to "invent" or "revise" the liturgy, but also not simply to freeze the current liturgy as if it were to be clung to unthinkingly. This is the program of "ressourcement" applied to worship and it is a matter of being radical enough to return to the roots so that the tree of worship can flourish and bear fruit today.

Over the next few days (or maybe weeks?) I'll try to post on each chapter. There are 12 chapters organized as follows:

PART I: THE ESSENCE OF THE LITURGY

1. Liturgy and Life: The Place of Liturgy in Reality

2. Liturgy - Cosmos - History

3. From Old Testament to New: The Fundamental Form of the Christian Liturgy - Its Determination by Biblical Faith

PART II: TIME AND SPACE IN THE LITURGY

1. The Relationship of the Liturgy to Time and Space: Some Preliminary Questions

2. Sacred Places - The Significance of the Church Building

3. The Altar and the Direction of Liturgical Prayer

4. The Reservation of the Blessed Sacrament

5. Sacred Time

PART III: ART AND LITURGY

1. The Question of Images

2. Music and Liturgy

PART IV: LITURGICAL FORM

1. Rite

2. The Body and Liturgy

(1) "Active Participation"

(2) The Sign of the Cross

(3) Posture

(4) Gestures

(5) The Human Voice

(6) Vestments

(7) Matter

One final note is on the meaning of the word "liturgy." Some refer to the "non-liturgical churches" as if it could be the case that any church could worship without liturgy. This is impossible. We all have liturgies. The Orthodox, RC, Anglican and some Protestant traditions have more or less fixed liturgies, whereas the so-called Free Churches do not. Yet every congregation falls into a fairly set liturgy over time, even if the liturgy is referred to as a "worship style." Since we all have liturgies of one kind or another, it is potentially instructive to learn from tradition other than our own. This is the goal of this series: to see what we can learn from the Roman Catholic tradition about worship.

This Is Not A Time To Live Without A Practice It Is A Time When All Of Us

SENT TO YOU BY MOYA VIA GOOGLE READER:"THIS IS NOT A TIME TO LIVE WITHOUT A PRACTICE. IT IS A TIME WHEN ALL OF US WILL NEED THE MOST..." via maia medicine on 10/31/10 "This is not a time to live without a practice. It is a time when all of us will need the most faithful, self-generated enthusiasm (enthusiasm: to be filled with god) in order to survive in human fashion. Whether we reach this inner state of recognized divinity through prayer, meditation, dancing, swimming, walking, feeding the hungry, or enriching the impoverished is immaterial. We will be doubly bereft without some form of practice that connects us, in a caring way, to what begins to feel like a dissolving world. In addition to contemplating the Hopi message "Know your garden and where is your water," we must also ask: What is my practice? What is steering this boat that is my fragile human life?" - "Shambhala Sun - Suffering Too Insignificant for the Majority to See" THINGS YOU CAN DO FROM HERE: * Subscribe to maia medicine using GOOGLE READER * Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with ALL YOUR FAVORITE SITES

Reference: witchnest.blogspot.com

Complete Home Cleansing

Spell A Day

Complete Home Cleansing

February 20

Saturday

Color of the day: Gray

Incense of the day: Rue

Well it's Saturday-a perfect time to banish and to cleanse. Let's tap into the energies of the waxing Moon and turn up the volume on your personal wards at your home. Begin by physically cleaning the house. Dust, vacuum, mop, take out the trash, and remove clutter. Then light a new white candle of any size or shape. Set up a work area in the heart of your home and repeat the protection charm three times.

As this New Moon-white candle glows,

All around me, protection does grow.

I banish all negativity and ill intent,

This spell will hold even after the candle is spent.

By Saturn's day and the element of fire,

This spell is now sealed by my will and desire.

Move the candle to a safe place and let it burn until it goes out on its own.

Source: ceremonial-magic.blogspot.com

Witches With Extra Love Spells Halloween

A long time ago I was initial, I wondered ~ how come I am not a witch ~ witches r cool, in the same way as they are human in every way but with added magical power! for example it is Halloween weekend I mood ultimate you back to facet at initial people who set the focus for the Halloween sexiness.. The sexy witches from the ahead...

Make use of ^ ^ and happy Halloween!

Oh, incase any person don't hold a date yet for the Halloween...... I found a fun simple magic spells a wonderful Spells' for you all to try, who's know by New Meeting you mood hold that special someone to start the new imagine see together... Have possession of fun :)

'This spell really does work. I hold used it and actually I met my husband decent a few weeks last I performed it. It is very certain and must be followed shrill.

Outdo Night: FridayBest Moon: Complete

Items you mood need:

1 sheet of lined paper

1 Red pen or place

1 communication pack up

your firm favorite perfume

your firm favorite come up with of red makeup

a few Optimistic or Red blossom petals

Comment out the personality you fancy in a enthusiast on the sheet of paper using the pen.

Close spritz the paper with your perfume.

Go bankrupt the paper and place it in the pack up.

Now ultimate the blossom petals, include them in your Right hand. Make certain yourself happy and in love, squeezing the petals careful in your hand. Continue envisioning this look over.

Effortlessness the petals hip the pack up. Property the pack up closed and end the whole spell with a kiss. Aid the red makeup and kiss the envelope!

Meaning in a coffer place. NEVER open it once more, if you do this mood break the spell.

*NOTE: DO NOT USE CHARACTERS/QUALITIES Exclusive TO A Hard Peculiar. THE Period Donate NOT Activate THAT WAY!'"
"
Below

Witch Genre in the ahead....

AND the hip develop WITCHES that don't seize to dress too underdeveloped and still rocks the looks!

......Numerous thamks to: Glamour Astonish. Comhttp://www.everythingunderthemoon.net/spells/simple-love-spell.htm

Curses In Literature 1 The Jackdaw Of Rheims

The Ingoldsby Legends is a charming and once enormously popular collection of myths and legends, written by Victorian clergyman called Richard Harris Barham. The most popular piece in the collection is undoubtedly 'The Jackdaw of Rheims,' an anti-Catholic poem which describes how a jackdaw steals a cardinal's ring and is made a saint, despite this impressive curse from the cardinal

The Cardinal rose with a dignified look,

He call'd for his candle, his bell, and his book!

In holy anger, and pious grief,

He solemnly cursed that rascally thief!

He cursed him at board, he cursed him in bed;

From the sole of his foot to the crown of his head;

He cursed him in sleeping, that every night

He should dream of the devil, and wake in a fright;

He cursed him in eating, he cursed him in drinking,

He cursed him in coughing, in sneezing, in winking;

He cursed him in sitting, in standing, in lying;

He cursed him in walking, in riding, in flying,

He cursed him in living, he cursed him dying!--

Never was heard such a terrible curse!

But what gave rise

To no little surprise,

Nobody seem'd one penny the worse!

See wiki for more on the author and his book -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The Ingoldsby Legends

Rituals And Spell Objectives Red Magic

As sooner or later as mercy full-grown the staff and weaponry gear to rout its to begin with natural predators and competitors it seems to go through helpful a passionate strain coil to itself in the form of internecine hostility. Abundant of the self we regard as inscription of our evolutionary execution, such as our opposable thumbs and tool custom abilities, our country for homily by valid, our suitable stance, and our country to fetch and give birth to commands and discipline, were just about undeniably select by ballot for dressed in millennia of park armed war involving secular bands. Our graciousness reflects our gory history, for what time it is outlawed to effect members of one's own dash, it leftover one's accountability to effect foreigners. The absolutely debate is out of the frame who constitutes one's own dash. To the same extent anxiety for war is restricted, we come up with sports and games in which to protest our violent behavior. From the whole background and terminology of sports event it is serious that sports event is good war with added program.

Nevertheless, it should not be whispered that war is true lacking program. Wars are fought to put in one's bargaining position; in war the attacker group is a gift that one wishes to commence some totally of order out of the frame. Wars are fought to disturb one's adversaries, not to wipe out them. Genocide is not war.

The engine and need of war reflects the "write off or cruise" collect built trendy our easy unsteady group. In contest, the aim is to disturb the attacker out of the write off mode and trendy cruise mode. Therefore, assuming donate is right parity of combine to make a write off activate important to any parties, morale is the firm detail in war. Unquestionably, it is the firm detail in approaching any inter-human aggressive, dressed in or air force know-how.

Red magic has two aspects, original the chant of the vigor, violent behavior, and morale to preserve oneself in any war from life in state-run to incompetent war, and secondly the need of actual competition magic. A arrangement of god forms stay in which the War-self can be spoken, bar hybrid or purely local forms work good as well. Ares, Ishtar, Ogoun, Thor, Mars, Mithras and Horus in lone are steadily recycled. Additional symbolism should not be disadvantaged. Firearms and explosives are as hospitable to the red gnosis as swords and spears. Drums are approaching crucial. Sigils hollow in inflammable liquids, or definitely whole fiery circles in which to conjure up should be intentional.

Quarrel magic is when all's said and done practiced widely with the doom animation publicly threatened and cursed, or wisdom himself the recipient of an unmanageable looking talisman, spell or rune. The aim is warning and order of one's doom who could do with and so be through as engrossed as feasible and alert of the origin of the effect. Previously competition magic takes the exceedingly state-run form as that recycled in Entropy Wake, with sigils and servitors thrill auto-destructive information to the pattern, bar with sub-lethal hint.

Nevertheless, the real attainment of red magic is to be able to be selected for such an overwhelming glamour of different vigor, morale and yet to come for violent behavior that the handling of competition magic is never sought.

Along with read this ebooks:Scott Cunningham - Earth Air Brightness And Wash Aloof Techniques Of Corporal Magic

Edred Thorsson - Futhark A Handbooks Of Rune Magic

Andrew Lang - Tale Prepare And Religious studies

Tags: photocopy power nature clearance opinions lemegeton theurgia goetia vocabulary gods pagan

The Truth Disease

This article was written months ago, but I wanted to sit on it and wait to publish it until just before the November mid-term elections -- or today.

It's by Jack Kinsella from THE OMEGA LETTER, whom I recently learned lives right here in Buffalo, NY just like me! Mr Kinsella will always hold a special place in my life because it was his online ministry that God used to finally open my eyes to the truth about Him and this world so many years ago.

In any event, he wrote a powerful commentary and I want to share it with all of you here. It's lengthy, but worth your time especially the concluding paragraphs.

THE "TRUTH DISEASE"

By Jack Kinsella

"This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good..." (2nd Timothy 3:1-3)

"And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another." (Matthew 24:10)

"A racist is a person winning an argument with a liberal" - Dick Morris

From time to time somebody will email me saying something along the lines of, "I enjoy your prophecy-based columns, but I think you should keep your political opinions to yourself - you'd have a lot more readers."

I don't know if that is true or not and I doubt I ever will, since it isn't possible to separate politics from prophecy. And while I don't deny I have a political perspective, that political perspective is shaped entirely by my Christian worldview.

I suppose one could call it my political 'opinion' but that is only because there are certain political positions I could never embrace without abandoning that worldview. I try not to advocate -- my worldview dictates that events are proceeding exactly as God intends them.

Although the context is a bit different, I try to follow the lead of Gamaliel as recorded in Acts 5:38-39 when it comes to politics:

"And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God."

I analyze politics according to my worldview, which is that, IF Bible prophecy is coming to pass in this generation then unfolding current events will confirm it.

Staying on top of politics is relevant to Bible prophecy because a nation's political worldview mirrors that nation's 'soul' -- and America is rapidly becoming a mirror-image of the worldview described by Paul in the context of the "last days" and "perilous times."

In the first three chapters of the Book of Revelation, Jesus addresses seven letters to the seven Churches then in existence in Asia Minor. Through the benefit of hindsight, one can look back and compare His assessment of each individual church to individual periods, or "epochs" within the Church Age.

The seventh and final Church to be addressed was the Church of Laodicea. The word "Laodicea" is a combination of two Greek words, "laos" meaning "the people" and "dike" meaning "rights" or "justice".

As understood in modern English, then, the Church of Laodicea describes the "Church of the People's Rights" or the democratic Church.

Jesus highlights their trust in their ability to govern themselves, judging and ruling and deciding apart from any true spiritual awareness, carefully separating church and state, so to speak.

"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God. I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of My mouth." (Revelation 3:14-16)

What does this mean? Clearly, it cannot mean the Laodiceans have lost their salvation. Hebrews 6:4 says that in such a case, it is impossible to renew one to repentance, but that is exactly what Jesus counsels the Laodicean Church to do -- repent.

"As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent." (Revelation 3:19)

Instead Jesus paints a word picture that in today's English would be the equivalent to saying the practices of the Laodiceans make Him sick to His stomach, before explaining why.

"Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:" (Revelation 3:14)

As we go on, you may have to reach for the Maalox yourself.

Assessment:

Tucker Carlson's excellent "Daily Caller" published a bombshell series of reports last month including evidence of a conspiracy among mainstream journalists to use their positions to act as direct agents of the Barack Obama campaign.

Incredibly, they actually documented the conspiracy at "Journolist," which describes itself as "The Internet For Journalists." (I note with interest that a number of the links on that site are now dead.)

They got together and decided to use the power of their positions to shield their favorite candidate (Barack Hussein Obama) from the fallout from his twenty-year relationship with Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

Wright as you will recall, was exposed as a ranting, anti-white, anti-American, anti-Jewish, pro-Islamic racist proponent of Black Liberation Theology whose rants shocked the nation.

After having heaped praise on Reverend Wright previously, crediting Wright with leading him "to Christ", officiating at his wedding and baptizing his daughters, and saying he was like an "uncle" Obama responded by denying he ever heard a single racist comment in twenty years of faithful attendance.

The liberal mainstream, having invested so much in the myth of a post-racial America under Barack Obama, concluded that lying to protect Obama by smearing his critics was in order.

According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.

In one instance, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama's relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama's conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, "Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares - and call them racists."

Michael Tomasky, a writer for the Guardian, also tried to rally his fellow members of Journolist: "Listen folks-in my opinion, we all have to do what we can to kill ABC and this idiocy in whatever venues we have. This isn't about defending Obama. This is about how the [mainstream media] kills any chance of discourse that actually serves the people."

"Richard Kim got this right above: 'a horrible glimpse of general election press strategy.' He's dead on," Tomasky continued. "We need to throw chairs now, try as hard as we can to get the call next time. Otherwise the questions in October will be exactly like this. This is just a disease."

The truth is "a disease?" So how best to start 'throwing chairs?" Thomas Shaller, who is both a political science professor and a columnist for the Baltimore Sun, proposed they enter into a deliberate conspiracy to influence the media coverage of the election.

"Why don't we use the power of this list to do something about the debate?"

If the truth is a disease, then it seems only logical that deception would serve as the cure before the 'disease of truth' prematurely claimed their messiah's candidacy. Indeed, why not? So Chris Hayes of the Nation proposed his colleagues simply bury the Wright story.

"I'm not saying we should all rush en masse to defend Wright. If you don't think he's worthy of defense, don't defend him! What I'm saying is that there is no earthly reason to use our various platforms to discuss what about Wright we find objectionable."

One of the conspirators' Katha Poliitt (also of the Nation) even admitted to growing weary of prostituting her profession as a propagandist:

"I hear you. but I am really tired of defending the indefensible. The people who attacked Clinton on Monica were prissy and ridiculous, but let me tell you it was no fun, as a feminist and a woman, waving aside as politically irrelevant and part of the vast rightwing conspiracy Paula, Monica, Kathleen, Juanita

Another allegedly "unbiased journalist" Spencer Ackerman (formerly of the Washington Independent concurred, writing in response;

"Part of me doesn't like this s
either. But what I like less is being governed by racists and warmongers."

But despite his distaste at selling out his Constitutional mandate as a journalist, Ackerman still managed to come up with a plan of action to deceive the public and evidently settle a few scores in the process.

"If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they've put upon us. Instead, take one of them - Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares - and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction."

Well? Are you sputtering with rage yet? If you are wondering how a pathologically racist Marxist candidate whose racism and socialist worldview were clearly demonstrated even before he got the nomination managed to make it all the way to the White House, now you know.

And if you ever doubted the power of the propagandists' pen, this should dispel any that may still be lingering. Some years ago I wrote the ebook, "Bodyguard of Lies" in which I made the proposition that almost everything we think we know is likely a lie.

We've been lied to so much and so often that the media is now divided by worldview into a 'liberal media' and a 'conservative media' without our ever realizing that somewhere along the line we subconsciously agreed to it, subconciously choosing which perspective we prefer the lies to be presented from.

I said at the outset that one cannot logically separate politics from prophecy in this generation because the politics of this generation are themselves a fulfillment of prophecy for the last days. There is little point to recording a prophecy if nobody takes notice of its fulfillment.

When Jesus was asked to outline the signs of His return, the FIRST thing He said was, "Take heed that no man deceive you." The Apostle Paul describes the antichrist as a master of deception who uses that deception to both gain and consolidate his power. (2nd Thessalonians 2:9-10)

The Apostle John says the False Prophet will use the power of deception to advance the worship of the antichrist. But before all that must first come the conditioning process. We had to get used to the fact that, like mushrooms, the public is fed manure and kept in the dark - and then learn to prefer it that way.

The Apostle Paul, after outlining the condition of the last days Church during perilous times, concluded his warning with the words;

"But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived." (2nd Timothy 3:13)

Now, to return to the issue of Bible prophecy, Christianity, politics and the last days and whether or not political discussion and opinion is appropriate to the mission of the Omega Letter, the answer is also found in Paul's second letter charging Timothy with his responsibilities before God.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry. (2nd Timothy 4:3)

That time has come and gone and all that remains is to "watch in all things, endure afflictions and do the work of an evangelist" until He comes.

That includes sorting out truth from fables so that we can witness the awesome power of God in action together. As bad as things look, as scary as they actually are, the fact that God told us this would happen means that everything is going according to plan.

It means that our side is winning and God has the enemy right where He wants him, even if we don't quite have it all figured out.

So the rest of the world can worry and fret and panic and cast about for a new messiah to replace the tarnished one invented by the 'unbiased' journalists they trust so much.

Our responsibility is somewhat different and a whole lot less stressful, especially in light of the revelation that the government we want to trust has, to all intents and purposes, been overthrown by a cabal of unelected conspirators.

"Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. all thy ways acknowledge him, and He shall direct thy paths." (Proverbs 3:5-6)

As you head to the polls, be prepared to be called a "racist" if you vote against any pro-Obama candidates. Be prepared to be called a "Tea Party Member" (a.k.a. "domestic, homegrown, right-wing terrorist") if you vote against any incumbent whether it's a Democrat or Republican.

Bottom line, whatever the outcome, don't place your trust in politicians or the local and federal government to protect and provide for you.

There's only One who could ever truly do that. Turn to Him and Him alone.

SHARE

Pope Saint Pius X The Church Does Not Have To Free Herself From Her Past

From RORATE CAELI:

CENTENNIAL

"NOTRE CHARGE APOSTOLIQUE"

THE CHURCH DOES NOT HAVE TO FREE HERSELF FROM HER PAST

On the feast of Saint Louis, King of France, 1910, exactly one hundred years ago, Pope Saint Pius X signed one of the most remarkable documents of his struggle against Modernism: "Notre Charge Apostolique", a letter addressed "to the Archbishops and Bishops of France", on the grave matter of the movement known as the "Sillon"["en francais"; in English]. Nearly three years after "Pascendi", Saint Pius X alerted the Bishops of France to another grave consequence of a lay Catholic movement out of control.

It is a letter which must be carefuly read, and in its entirety, by all Catholics of our age. The errors of the Sillon are the same so prevalent in these post-Conciliar time. In our previous post, we presented what the Sillon was and how it came to be. Today, we present its errors, and the great lessons of Pope Sarto for all Catholics.

"ON CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATIONWe know well that they flatter themselves with the idea of raising human dignity and the discredited condition of the working class. We know that they wish to render just and perfect the labor laws and the relations between employers and employees, thus causing a more complete justice and a greater measure of charity to prevail upon earth, and causing also a profound and fruitful transformation in society by which mankind would make an undreamed-of progress. Certainly, We do not blame these efforts; they would be excellent in every respect if the Sillonist did not forget that a person's progress consists in developing his natural abilities by fresh motivations; that it consists also in permitting these motivations to operate within the frame of, and in conformity with, the laws of human nature. But, on the contrary, by ignoring the laws governing human nature and by breaking the bounds within which they operate, the human person is lead, not toward progress, but towards death. This, nevertheless, is what they want to do with human society; they dream of changing its natural and traditional foundations; they dream of a Future City built on different principles, and they dare to proclaim these more fruitful and more beneficial than the principles upon which the present Christian City rests.

No, Venerable Brethren, WE MUST REPEAT WITH THE UTMOST ENERGY IN THESE TIMES OF SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL ANARCHY WHEN EVERYONE TAKES IT UPON HIMSELF TO TEACH AS A TEACHER AND LAWMAKER - THE CITY CANNOT BE BUILT OTHERWISE THAN AS GOD HAS BUILT IT; society cannot be setup unless the Church lays the foundations and supervises the work; no, civilization is not something yet to be found, nor is the New City to be built on hazy notions; IT HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE AND STILL IS: IT IS CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION, IT IS THE CATHOLIC CITY. IT HAS ONLY TO BE SET UP AND RESTORED CONTINUALLY AGAINST THE UNREMITTING ATTACKS OF INSANE DREAMERS, REBELS AND MISCREANTS....ON EQUALITY[T]HE SILLON SAYS THAT IT IS STRIVING TO ESTABLISH AN ERA OF EQUALITY WHICH, BY THAT VERY FACT, WOULD BE ALSO AN ERA OF GREATER JUSTICE. THUS, TO THE SILLON, EVERY INEQUALITY OF CONDITION IS AN INJUSTICE, OR AT LEAST, A DIMINUTION OF JUSTICE? HERE WE HAVE A PRINCIPLE THAT CONFLICTS SHARPLY WITH THE NATURE OF THINGS, A PRINCIPLE CONDUCIVE TO JEALOUSLY, INJUSTICE, AND SUBVERSIVE TO ANY SOCIAL ORDER. THUS, DEMOCRACY ALONE WILL BRING ABOUT THE REIGN OF PERFECT JUSTICE! IS THIS NOT AN INSULT TO OTHER FORMS OF GOVERNMENT WHICH ARE THEREBY DEBASED TO THE LEVEL OF STERILE MAKESHIFTS?...ON FRATERNITYCATHOLIC DOCTRINE TELLS US THAT THE PRIMARY DUTY OF CHARITY DOES NOT LIE IN THE TOLERATION OF FALSE IDEAS, HOWEVER SINCERE THEY MAY BE, NOR IN THE THEORETICAL OR PRACTICAL INDIFFERENCE TOWARDS THE ERRORS AND VICES IN WHICH WE SEE OUR BRETHREN PLUNGED, BUT IN THE ZEAL FOR THEIR INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL IMPROVEMENT AS WELL AS FOR THEIR MATERIAL WELL-BEING. Catholic doctrine further tells us that LOVE FOR OUR NEIGHBOR FLOWS FROM OUR LOVE FOR GOD, Who is Father to all, and goal of the whole human family; and in Jesus Christ whose members we are, to the point that in doing good to others we are doing good to Jesus Christ Himself. ANY OTHER KIND OF LOVE IS SHEER ILLUSION, STERILE AND FLEETING.

Indeed, we have the human experience of pagan and secular societies of ages past to show that concern for common interests or affinities of nature weigh very little against the passions and wild desires of the heart. No, Venerable Brethren, THERE IS NO GENUINE FRATERNITY OUTSIDE CHRISTIAN CHARITY. Through the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ Our Saviour, Christian charity embraces all men, comforts all, and leads all to the same faith and same heavenly happiness.

BY SEPARATING FRATERNITY FROM CHRISTIAN CHARITY THUS UNDERSTOOD, DEMOCRACY, FAR FROM BEING A PROGRESS, WOULD MEAN A DISASTROUS STEP BACKWARDS FOR CIVILIZATION. If, as We desire with all Our heart, the highest possible peak of wellbeing for society and its members is to be attained through fraternity or, as it is also called, universal solidarity, all minds must be united in the knowledge of Truth, all wills united in morality, and all hearts in the love of God and His Son Jesus Christ. But THIS UNION IS ATTAINABLE ONLY BY CATHOLIC CHARITY, AND THAT IS WHY CATHOLIC CHARITY ALONE CAN LEAD THE PEOPLE IN THE MARCH OF PROGRESS TOWARDS THE IDEAL CIVILIZATION....ON HUMAN DIGNITY

[A]T THE ROOT OF ALL THEIR FALLACIES ON SOCIAL QUESTIONS, LIE THE FALSE HOPES OF SILLONISTS ON HUMAN DIGNITY. ACCORDING TO THEM, MAN WILL BE A MAN TRULY WORTHY OF THE NAME ONLY WHEN HE HAS ACQUIRED A STRONG, ENLIGHTENED, AND INDEPENDENT CONSCIOUSNESS, ABLE TO DO WITHOUT A MASTER, OBEYING ONLY HIMSELF, AND ABLE TO ASSUME THE MOST DEMANDING RESPONSIBILITIES WITHOUT FALTERING. SUCH ARE THE BIG WORDS BY WHICH HUMAN PRIDE IS EXALTED, LIKE A DREAM CARRYING MAN AWAY WITHOUT LIGHT, WITHOUT GUIDANCE, AND WITHOUT HELP into the realm of illusion in which he will be destroyed by his errors and passions whilst awaiting the glorious day of his full consciousness. And that great day, when will it come? Unless human nature can be changed, which is not within the power of the Sillonists, will that day ever come? DID THE SAINTS WHO BROUGHT HUMAN DIGNITY TO ITS HIGHEST POINT, POSSESS THAT KIND OF DIGNITY? AND WHAT OF THE LOWLY OF THIS EARTH WHO ARE UNABLE TO RAISE SO HIGH BUT ARE CONTENT TO PLOW THEIR FURROW MODESTLY AT THE LEVEL WHERE PROVIDENCE PLACED THEM? THEY WHO ARE DILIGENTLY DISCHARGING THEIR DUTIES WITH CHRISTIAN HUMILITY, OBEDIENCE, AND PATIENCE, ARE THEY NOT ALSO WORTHY OF BEING CALLED MEN? WILL NOT OUR LORD TAKE THEM ONE DAY OUT OF THEIR OBSCURITY AND PLACE THEM IN HEAVEN AMONGST THE PRINCES OF HIS PEOPLE?...DISTRUST OF THE CHURCH:

DISTRUST OF THE CHURCH, THEIR MOTHER, IS BEING INSTILLED INTO THE MINDS OF CATHOLIC YOUTH; THEY ARE BEING TAUGHT THAT AFTER NINETEEN CENTURIES SHE HAS NOT YET BEEN ABLE TO BUILD UP IN THIS WORLD A SOCIETY ON TRUE FOUNDATIONS; SHE HAS NOT UNDERSTOOD THE SOCIAL NOTIONS OF AUTHORITY, LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY AND HUMAN DIGNITY; THEY ARE TOLD THAT THE GREAT BISHOPS AND KINGS, WHO HAVE MADE FRANCE WHAT IT IS AND GOVERNED IT SO GLORIOUSLY, HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GIVE THEIR PEOPLE TRUE JUSTICE AND TRUE HAPPINESS because they did not possess the Sillonist Ideal!...CHURCH AND POLITICS

WE DO NOT HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE HERE THAT THE ADVENT OF UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY IS OF NO CONCERN TO THE ACTION OF THE CHURCH IN THE WORLD; WE HAVE ALREADY RECALLED THAT THE CHURCH HAS ALWAYS LEFT TO THE NATIONS THE CARE OF GIVING THEMSELVES THE FORM OF GOVERNMENT WHICH THEY THINK MOST SUITED TO THEIR NEEDS. What We wish to affirm once again, after Our Predecessor, is that IT IS AN ERROR AND A DANGER TO BIND DOWN CATHOLICISM BY PRINCIPLE TO A PARTICULAR FORM OF GOVERNMENT. THIS ERROR AND THIS DANGER ARE ALL THE GREATER WHEN RELIGION IS ASSOCIATED WITH A KIND OF DEMOCRACY WHOSE DOCTRINES ARE FALSE. But this is what the Sillon is doing. For the sake of a particular political form, it compromises the Church, it sows division among Catholics, snatches away young people and even priests and seminarists from purely Catholic action, and is wasting away as a dead loss part of the living forces of the nation.

And, behold, Venerable Brethren, an astounding contradiction: It is precisely because religion ought to transcend all parties, and it is in appealing to this principle, that the Sillon abstains from defending the beleaguered Church. CERTAINLY, IT IS NOT THE CHURCH THAT HAS GONE INTO THE POLITICAL ARENA: THEY HAVE DRAGGED HERE THERE TO MUTILATE AND TO DESPOIL HER. IS IT NOT THE DUTY OF EVERY CATHOLIC, THEN, TO USE THE POLITICAL WEAPONS WHICH HE HOLDS, TO DEFEND HER?...

POLITICS AND RELIGIOUS PROMISCUITY

THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE SILLON, AS SUCH, WAS TRULY CATHOLIC. IT RECOGNIZED BUT ONE MORAL FORCE - CATHOLICISM; AND THE SILLONISTS WERE WONT TO PROCLAIM THAT DEMOCRACY WOULD HAVE TO BE CATHOLIC OR WOULD NOT EXIST AT ALL. A TIME CAME WHEN THEY CHANGED THEIR MINDS. THEY LEFT TO EACH ONE HIS RELIGION OR HIS PHILOSOPHY. THEY CEASED TO CALL THEMSELVES CATHOLICS AND, FOR THE FORMULA "DEMOCRACY WILL BE CATHOLIC" THEY SUBSTITUTED "DEMOCRACY WILL NOT BE ANTI-CATHOLIC", ANY MORE THAN IT WILL BE ANTI-JEWISH OR ANTI-BUDDHIST.... Thus, a host of new groups, Catholic, Protestant, Free-Thinking, now apparently autonomous, are invited to set to work: "Catholic comrades will work between themselves in a special organization and will learn and educate themselves. Protestant and Free-Thinking Democrats will do likewise on their own side. But all of us, Catholics, Protestants and Free-Thinkers will have at heart to arm young people, not in view of the fratricidal struggle, but in view of a disinterested emulation in the field of social and civic virtues."

HERE WE HAVE, FOUNDED BY CATHOLICS, AN INTER-DENOMINATIONAL ASSOCIATION THAT IS TO WORK FOR THE REFORM OF CIVILIZATION, AN UNDERTAKING WHICH IS ABOVE ALL RELIGIOUS IN CHARACTER; FOR THERE IS NO TRUE CIVILIZATION WITHOUT A MORAL CIVILIZATION, AND NO TRUE MORAL CIVILIZATION WITHOUT THE TRUE RELIGION: IT IS A PROVEN TRUTH, A HISTORICAL FACT. The new Sillonists cannot pretend that they are merely working on "the ground of practical realities" where differences of belief do not matter. Their leader is so conscious of the influence which the convictions of the mind have upon the result of the action, that he invites them, whatever religion they may belong to, "to provide on the ground of practical realities, the proof of the excellence of their personal convictions." And with good reason: indeed, ALL PRACTICAL RESULTS REFLECT THE NATURE OF ONES RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS, JUST AS THE LIMBS OF A MAN DOWN TO HIS FINGER-TIPS, OWE THEIR VERY SHAPE TO THE PRINCIPLE OF LIFE THAT DWELLS IN HIS BODY....This being said, what must be thought of the promiscuity in which young Catholics will be caught up with heterodox and unbelieving folk in a work of this nature? Is it not a thousand-fold more dangerous for them than a neutral association? What are we to think of this appeal to all the heterodox, and to all the unbelievers, to prove the excellence of their convictions in the social sphere in a sort of apologetic contest? Has not this contest lasted for nineteen centuries in conditions less dangerous for the faith of Catholics? And was it not all to the credit of the Catholic Church? WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF THIS RESPECT FOR ALL ERRORS, AND OF THIS STRANGE INVITATION MADE BY A CATHOLIC TO ALL THE DISSIDENTS TO STRENGTHEN THEIR CONVICTIONS THROUGH STUDY SO THAT THEY MAY HAVE MORE AND MORE ABUNDANT SOURCES OF FRESH FORCES? WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF AN ASSOCIATION IN WHICH ALL RELIGIONS AND EVEN FREE-THOUGHT MAY EXPRESS THEMSELVES OPENLY AND IN COMPLETE FREEDOM? For the Sillonists who, in public lectures and elsewhere, proudly proclaim their personal faith, certainly do not intend to silence others nor do they intend to prevent a Protestant from asserting his Protestantism, and the skeptic from affirming his skepticism. Finally, WHAT ARE WE TO THINK OF A CATHOLIC WHO, ON ENTERING HIS STUDY GROUP, LEAVES HIS CATHOLICISM OUTSIDE THE DOOR so as not to alarm his comrades who, "dreaming of disinterested social action, are not inclined to make it serve the triumph of interests, coteries and even convictions whatever they may be"?...

THE GOAL OF HUMANISTIC DEMOCRACY: A NEW UNIVERSAL RELIGION

WHEN WE CONSIDER THE FORCES, KNOWLEDGE, AND SUPERNATURAL VIRTUES WHICH ARE NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH THE CHRISTIAN CITY, and the sufferings of millions of martyrs, and the light given by the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and the self-sacrifice of all the heroes of charity, and a powerful hierarchy ordained in heaven, and the streams of Divine Grace - the whole having been built up, bound together, and impregnated by the life and spirit of Jesus Christ, the Wisdom of God, the Word made man - when we think, I say, of all this, iT IS FRIGHTENING TO BEHOLD NEW APOSTLES EAGERLY ATTEMPTING TO DO BETTER BY A COMMON INTERCHANGE OF VAGUE IDEALISM AND CIVIC VIRTUES. WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO PRODUCE? WHAT IS TO COME OF THIS COLLABORATION? A mere VERBAL AND CHIMERICAL CONSTRUCTION IN WHICH WE SHALL SEE, GLOWING IN A JUMBLE, AND IN SEDUCTIVE CONFUSION, THE WORDS LIBERTY, JUSTICE, FRATERNITY, LOVE, EQUALITY, AND HUMAN EXULTATION, ALL RESTING UPON AN ILL-UNDERSTOOD HUMAN DIGNITY. It will be A TUMULTUOUS AGITATION, STERILE FOR THE END PROPOSED, BUT WHICH WILL BENEFIT THE LESS UTOPIAN EXPLOITERS OF THE PEOPLE. Yes, we can truly say that THE SILLON, ITS EYES FIXED ON A CHIMERA, BRINGS SOCIALISM IN ITS TRAIN.

We fear that worse is to come: THE END RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPING PROMISCUOUSNESS, THE BENEFICIARY OF THIS COSMOPOLITAN SOCIAL ACTION, CAN ONLY BE A DEMOCRACY WHICH WILL BE NEITHER CATHOLIC, NOR PROTESTANT, NOR JEWISH. IT WILL BE A RELIGION (for Sillonism, so the leaders have said, is a religion) MORE UNIVERSAL THAN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, UNITING ALL MEN BECOME BROTHERS AND COMRADES at last in the "Kingdom of God". - "WE DO NOT WORK FOR THE CHURCH, WE WORK FOR MANKIND."

CHRIST: GENTLE AND STRONG

AS SOON AS THE SOCIAL QUESTION IS BEING APPROACHED, IT IS THE FASHION IN SOME QUARTERS TO FIRST PUT ASIDE THE DIVINITY OF JESUS CHRIST, AND THEN TO MENTION ONLY HIS UNLIMITED CLEMENCY, HIS COMPASSION FOR ALL HUMAN MISERIES, AND HIS PRESSING EXHORTATIONS TO THE LOVE OF OUR NEIGHBOR AND TO THE BROTHERHOOD OF MEN. True, Jesus has loved us with an immense, infinite love, and He came on earth to suffer and die so that, gathered around Him in justice and love, motivated by the same sentiments of mutual charity, all men might live in peace and happiness. But FOR THE REALIZATION OF THIS TEMPORAL AND ETERNAL HAPPINESS, HE HAS LAID DOWN WITH SUPREME AUTHORITY THE CONDITION THAT WE MUST BELONG TO HIS FLOCK, THAT WE MUST ACCEPT HIS DOCTRINE, THAT WE MUST PRACTICE VIRTUE, AND THAT WE MUST ACCEPT THE TEACHING AND GUIDANCE OF PETER AND HIS SUCCESSORS. FURTHER, WHILST JESUS WAS KIND TO SINNERS AND TO THOSE WHO WENT ASTRAY, HE DID NOT RESPECT THEIR FALSE IDEAS, however sincere they might have appeared. HE LOVED THEM ALL, BUT HE INSTRUCTED THEM IN ORDER TO CONVERT THEM AND SAVE THEM. Whilst He called to Himself in order to comfort them, those who toiled and suffered, it was not to preach to them the jealousy of a chimerical equality. Whilst He lifted up the lowly, it was not to instill in them the sentiment of a dignity independent from, and rebellious against, the duty of obedience. Whilst His heart overflowed with gentleness for the souls of good-will, He could also arm Himself with holy indignation against the profaners of the House of God, against the wretched men who scandalized the little ones, against the authorities who crush the people with the weight of heavy burdens without putting out a hand to lift them. HE WAS AS STRONG AS HE WAS GENTLE. HE REPROVED, THREATENED, CHASTISED, KNOWING, AND TEACHING US THAT FEAR IS THE BEGINNING OF WISDOM, AND THAT IT IS SOMETIMES PROPER FOR A MAN TO CUT OFF AN OFFENDING LIMB TO SAVE HIS BODY. Finally, He did not announce for future society the reign of an ideal happiness from which suffering would be banished; but, by His lessons and by His example, He traced THE PATH OF THE HAPPINESS which is possible on earth and of the perfect happiness in heaven: THE ROYAL WAY OF THE CROSS. These are teachings that it would be wrong to apply only to one's personal life in order to win eternal salvation; these are eminently social teachings, and they show in Our Lord Jesus Christ SOMETHING QUITE DIFFERENT FROM AN INCONSISTENT AND IMPOTENT HUMANITARIANISM.

THE TRUE FRIENDS OF THE PEOPLE ARE TRADITIONALISTSMOREOVER, SINCE IN THE CLASH OF INTERESTS, AND ESPECIALLY IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST DISHONEST FORCES, THE VIRTUE OF MAN, AND EVEN HIS HOLINESS ARE NOT ALWAYS SUFFICIENT TO GUARANTEE HIM HIS DAILY BREAD, AND SINCE SOCIAL STRUCTURES, THROUGH THEIR NATURAL INTERPLAY, OUGHT TO BE DEVISED TO THWART THE EFFORTS OF THE UNSCRUPULOUS AND ENABLE ALL MEN OF GOOD WILL TO ATTAIN THEIR LEGITIMATE SHARE OF TEMPORAL HAPPINESS, WE EARNESTLY DESIRE THAT YOU SHOULD TAKE AN ACTIVE PART IN THE ORGANIZATION OF SOCIETY WITH THIS OBJECTIVE IN MIND. AND, TO THIS END, WHILST YOUR PRIESTS WILL ZEALOUSLY DEVOTE EFFORTS TO THE SANCTIFICATION OF SOULS, TO THE DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH, AND ALSO TO WORKS OF CHARITY IN THE STRICT SENSE, YOU SHALL SELECT A FEW OF THEM, LEVEL-HEADED AND OF ACTIVE DISPOSITION, HOLDERS OF DOCTORS DEGREES IN PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY, THOROUGHLY ACQUAINTED WITH THE HISTORY OF ANCIENT AND MODERN CIVILIZATIONS, AND YOU SHALL SET THEM TO THE NOT-SO-LOFTY BUT MORE PRACTICAL STUDY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCE SO THAT YOU MAY PLACE THEM AT THE OPPORTUNE TIME AT THE HELM OF YOUR WORKS OF CATHOLIC ACTION. HOWEVER, LET NOT THESE PRIESTS BE MISLED, IN THE MAZE OF CURRENT OPINIONS, BY THE MIRACLES OF A FALSE DEMOCRACY. LET THEM NOT BORROW FROM THE RHETORIC OF THE WORST ENEMIES OF THE CHURCH AND OF THE PEOPLE, THE HIGH-FLOWN PHRASES, FULL OF PROMISES; WHICH ARE AS HIGH-SOUNDING AS UNATTAINABLE. LET THEM BE CONVINCED THAT THE SOCIAL QUESTION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE DID NOT ARISE ONLY YESTERDAY; THAT THE CHURCH AND THE STATE, AT ALL TIMES AND IN HAPPY CONCERT, HAVE RAISED UP FRUITFUL ORGANIZATIONS TO THIS END; THAT THE CHURCH, which has never betrayed the happiness of the people by consenting to dubious alliances, DOES NOT HAVE TO FREE HERSELF FROM THE PAST; that all that is needed is to take up again, with the help of the true workers for a social restoration, the organisms which the Revolution shattered, and to adapt them, in the same Christian spirit that inspired them, to the new environment arising from the material development of today's society. INDEED, THE TRUE FRIENDS OF THE PEOPLE ARE NEITHER REVOLUTIONARIES, NOR INNOVATORS: THEY ARE TRADITIONALISTS.

Link

The Redeeming Love Of Christ And Lgbt Homeless Youth

ChurchandWorld linked to a poignant story of children killed by their own tribe's people in order to stave off supposed curses to the community. "Ethiopia's river of death," reminded me of other missionary stories I have read. "Lord's of the Earth", a sequel to "Peace Child", tells of children thrown into the river because they wandered into forbidden territory. Another is "Mary Slessor-Everybody's Mother", the story of a Scottish Presbyterian missionary who began her ministry in Africa saving twins who were deemed cursed because they were twins. The transforming work of Christ ends the awfulness of such practices; it will hopefully do the same in Ethiopia. But I am also reminded about the article Michael Adee posted on the More Light Presbyterian site, "Sojourners Enters into Fuller Conversation About LGBT Issues." I am not finished addressing it. It too is about children at risk, homeless LGBT youth. They too are to easily pitched in the river or undone by the wolves, just in a different manner. And no one seems to care for their souls; certainly not LGBT political organizations who are now using them as pawns in a political game.In the first posting I wrote on this subject, LGBT homeless youth he forgives, restores, meets needs and transforms the sinner. He heals within the community and in the individual heart.Despite any organization's use of derogatory words such as bigotry or homophobia, the Church has an obligation to the homeless and rejected to both care for and proclaim God's words to them. Carefully, with integrity the young people, LGBT young people, need to learn from the Scriptures of God's grace and God's will that the Christian, redeemed by Christ, walks in obedience to his Lord. Holiness is an out growth of discipleship.It is not a question of government grants or subsidies, what matters are Christian care and Christian witness. Those who fail to lead the young to new life in Christ because of a misplaced allegiance to culture or political correctness should be reminded that Jesus said it would be better to have a heavy millstone hung about one's neck and be cast into the sea then to offend the young who believe in Jesus. (Matthew 18:4-6) And to leave them in their sin without any words about the redeeming grace of Jesus Christ is sin.

Review Miracles Now 108 Life Changing Tools

I'm going to be open, I apparently wouldn't select up a book with the direction Miracles Nowunless I was not compulsory it to review, which is, of course, why I've been reading this new self-help book from Hay Local.

Why wouldn't I display been diagrammatic to it by the title? While I don't lay a wager miracles live that recurrently. Clear I understand their place in the vinyl to chief religion, and I really understand the direct for a sensation while faced with such fill as, say, dangerous reluctance, but at meeting point I'm a bit of a atheist.

But having read it I realise I'd display been absent out if I had let the direction put me off. Miracles Now, by Gabrielle Bernstein, has the heading 108 Life-Changing Tackle for Beneath Import, Expert Carry on and Revealing Your Absolute Promontory. When it describes are quick and simple ways of tackling a full-size range of common problems that cudgel up in model life, from stress, wakefulness and job worries to interlude start off and learning while to say "no".

The sections are cyclone too - from rational a attach of paragraphs to maybe a attach of pages, no aloof. Unquestionably easy to turn to for talk about in become old of thought. The techniques are explained simply and can be done quickly. They facet fill friendship small meditations, sentient military exercises, good affirmations and the good old craft of in vogue an low band on your wrist and pinging it to evoke yourself to "furnish out" of a bad practice.

Publisher Hay Local meant about the book: "Miracles Now by New York Get older bestselling inventor Gabrielle Bernstein wish help readers effective stress and find accordance - even if they unmarried display a atomic to spare... Moved by some of the greatest extent spiritual knowledge, Bernstein offers up spirit-based sense of right and wrong, meditations and practical, do-them-in-the-moment tools to help readers burst train blocks to after everything else with aloof settle down."

Miracles Now has expansive media junkies friendship me in stalk. Every person grouping ends with a 140-character study - imagine for cheeping (lay down with the hashtag #108Miracles) as well as repeating as a song. And Gabrielle even offers orders for intimates beleaguered by austere posts in their Facebook feed: "Free and rub out".

Despite the consequences my characters with the direction, Miracles Now is a book I am guaranteed I wish keep up to to slacken to. The expert techniques that it describes for behavior with life's slight problems could maybe spot as mini-miracles, even if I serene consider I serene choose to scrape the word "sensation" in its big observe for the cover abruptly being well-matched to see, a heal for cancer, world accordance, an end to like and a way to plug up global warming. Allay, I front even the big fill can start paltry, with something friendship a muscular breath, a smirk and a bit of chance.

Gabrielle Bernstein's rather than books facet May Rapid Miracles: A 6-Week Kick-Start to Free Happinessand Willpower Junkie: A Revolutionary Feature to Discovering Self-Love and Miracles. She too created the CD MediDating.

Links and go on pertinent posts

http://www.hayhouse.co.uk/

Miracles Now: 108 Life-Changing Tackle for Beneath Import, Expert Carry on and Revealing Your Absolute Promontory

http://www.badwitch.co.uk/2011/11/review-medidating-for-fearless-romance.html

http://www.badwitch.co.uk/2012/05/soul-centred-transform-your-life-with.html

Latin Mass Returning

Case for the Latin Mass

DIETRICH VON HILDEBRAND

Dietrich von Hildebrand, was one of the world's most eminent Christian philosophers. A professor at Fordham University, Pope Pius XII called him "the 20th Century Doctor of the Church." He is the author of many books, including Transformation in Christ and Liturgy and Personality.

[Reprinted from the October 1966 issue of TRIUMPH]

THE ARGUMENTS for the New Liturgy have been neatly packaged, and may now be learned by rote. The new form of the Mass is designed to engage the celebrant and the faithful in a communal activity. In the past the faithful attended mass in personal isolation, each worshipper making his private devotions, or at best following the proceedings in his missal. Today the faithful can grasp the social character of the celebration; they are learning to appreciate it as a community meal. Formerly, the priest mumbled in a dead language, which created a barrier between priest and people. Now everyone speaks in English, which tends to unite priest and people with one another. In the past the priest said mass with his back to the people, which created the mood of an esoteric rite. Today, because the priest faces the people, the mass is a more fraternal occasion. In the past the priest intoned strange medieval chants. Today the entire assembly sings songs with easy tunes and familiar lyrics, and is even experimenting with folk music. The case for the new mass, then, comes down to this: it is making the faithful more at home in the house of God.

Moreover, these innovations are said to have the sanction of Authority: they are represented as an obedient response to the spirit of the Second Vatican Council. This is said notwithstanding that the Council's Constitution on the Liturgy goes no further than to permit the vernacular mass in cases where the local bishop believes it desirable; the Constitution plainly insists on the retention of the Latin mass, and emphatically approves the Gregorian chant. But the liturgical "progressives" are not impressed by the difference between permitting and commanding. Nor do they hesitate to authorize changes, such as standing to receive Holy Communion, which the Constitution does not mention at all. The progressives argue that these liberties may be taken because the Constitution is, after all, only the first step in an evolutionary process. And they seem to be having their way. It is difficult to find a Latin mass anywhere today, and in the United States they are practically non-existent. Even the conventual mass in monasteries is said in the vernacular, and the glorious Gregorian is replaced by insignificant melodies.

MY CONCERN is not with the legal status of the changes. And I emphatically do not wish to be understood as regretting that the Constitution has permitted the vernacular to complement the Latin. What I deplore is that the new mass is replacing the Latin Mass, that the old liturgy is being recklessly scrapped, and denied to most of the People of God.

I should like to put to those who are fostering this development several questions: Does the new mass, more than the old, bestir the human spirit -- does it evoke a sense of eternity? Does it help raise our hearts from the concerns of everyday life -- from the purely natural aspects of the world-to Christ? Does it increase reverence, an appreciation of the sacred?

Of course these questions are rhetorical, and self-answering. I raise them because I think that all thoughtful Christians will want to weigh their importance before coming to a conclusion about the merits of the new liturgy. What is the role of reverence in a truly Christian life, and above all in a truly Christian worship of God?

Reverence gives being the opportunity to speak to us: The ultimate grandeur of man is to be capax Dei. Reverence is of capital importance to all the fundamental domains of man's life. It can be rightly called "the mother of all virtues," for it is the basic attitude that all virtues presuppose. The most elementary gesture of reverence is a response to being itself. It distinguishes the autonomous majesty of being from mere illusion or fiction; it is a recognition of the inner consistency and positiveness of being-of its independence of our arbitrary moods. Reverence gives being the opportunity to unfold itself, to, as it were, speak to us; to fecundate our minds. Therefore reverence is indispensable to any adequate knowledge of being. The depth and plenitude of being, and above all its mysteries, will never be revealed to any but the reverent mind. Remember that reverence is a constitutive element of the capacity to "wonder," which Plato and Aristotle claimed to be the indispensable condition for philosophy. Indeed, irreverence is a chief source of philosophical error. But if reverence is the necessary basis for all reliable knowledge of being, it is, beyond that, indispensable for grasping and assessing the values grounded in being. Only the reverent man who is ready to admit the existence of something greater than himself, who is willing to be silent and let the object speak to him- who opens himself-is capable of entering the sublime world of values. Moreover, once a gradation of values has been recognized, a new kind of reverence is in order-a reverence that responds not only to the majesty of being as such, but to the specific value of a specific being and to its rank in the hierarchy of values. And this new reverence permits the discovery of still other values.

Man reflects his essentially receptive character as a created person solely in the reverent attitude; the ultimate grandeur of man is to be capax Dei. Man has the capacity, in other words, to grasp something greater than himself, to be affected and fecundated by it, to abandon himself to it for its own sake - in a pure response to its value. This ability to transcend himself distinguishes man from a plant or an animal; these latter strive only to unfold their own entelechy. Now: it is only the reverent man who can consciously transcend himself and thus conform to his fundamental human condition and to his metaphysical situation.

Do we better meet Christ by soaring up to Him, or by dragging Him down into our workaday world?

The irreverent man by contrast, approaches being either in an attitude of arrogant superiority or of tactless, smug familiarity. In either case he is crippled; he is the man who comes so near a tree or building he can no longer see it. Instead of remaining at the proper spiritual distance, and maintaining a reverent silence so that being may speak its word, he obtrudes himself and thereby, in effect, silences being. In no domain is reverence more important than religion. As we have seen, it profoundly affects the relation of man to God. But beyond that it pervades the entire religion, especially the worship of God. There is an intimate link between reverence and sacredness: reverence permits us to experience the sacred, to rise above the profane; irreverence blinds us to the entire world of the sacred. Reverence, including awe-indeed, fear and trembling-is the specific response to the sacred.

Rudolf Otto has clearly elaborated the point in his famous study, The Idea of the Holy. Kierkegaard also calls attention to the essential role of reverence in the religious act, in the encounter with God. And did not the Jews tremble in deep awe when the priest brought the sacrifice into the rancta sanctorum? Was Isaiah not struck with godly fear when he saw Yahweh in the temple and exclaimed, "Woe is me, I am doomed! For I am a man of unclean lips... yet my eyes have seen the King?" Do not the words of St. Peter after the miraculous catch of fish, "Depart from me, 0 Lord, because I am a sinner," testify that when the reality of God breaks in upon us we are struck with fear and reverence? Cardinal Newman has shown in a stunning sermon that the man who does not fear and revere has not known the reality of God.

When St. Bonaventure writes in Itinerium Mentis ad Deum that only a man of desire (such as Daniel) can understand God, he means that a certain attitude of soul must be achieved in order to understand the world of God, into which He wants to lead us.

This counsel is especially applicable to the Church's liturgy. The sursum corda-the lifting up of our hearts-is the first requirement for real participation in the mass. Nothing could better obstruct the confrontation of man with God than the notion that we "go unto the altar of God" as we would go to a pleasant, relaxing social gathering. This is why the Latin mass with Gregorian chant, which raises us up to a sacred atmosphere, is vastly superior to a vernacular mass with popular songs, which leaves us in a profane, merely natural atmosphere.

The basic error of most of the innovations is to imagine that the new liturgy brings the holy sacrifice of the mass nearer to the faithful, that shorn of its old rituals the mass now enters into the substance of our lives. For the question is whether we better meet Christ in the mass by soaring up to Him, or by dragging Him down into our own pedestrian, workaday world. The innovators would replace holy intimacy with Christ by an unbecoming familiarity. The new liturgy actually threatens to frustrate the confrontation with Christ, for it discourages reverence in the face of mystery, precludes awe, and all but extinguishes a sense of sacredness. What really matters, surely, is not whether the faithful feel at home at mass, but whether they are drawn out of their ordinary lives into the world of Christ-whether their attitude is the response of ultimate reverence: whether they are imbued with the reality of Christ.

THOSE WHO RHAPSODIZE on the new liturgy make much of the point that over the years the mass had lost its communal character and had become an occasion for individualistic worship. The new vernacular mass, they insist, restores the sense of community by replacing private de- votions with community participation. Yet they forget that there are different levels and kinds of communion with other persons. The level and nature of a community experience is determined by the theme of the communion, the name or cause in which men are gathered. The higher the good which the theme represents, and which binds men together, the more sublime and deeper is the communion. The ethos and nature of a community experience in the case of a great national emergency is obviously radically different from the community experience of a cocktail party. And of course the most striking differences in communities will be found between the community whose theme is supernatural and the one whose theme is merely natural. The actualization of men's souls who are truly touched by Christ is the basis of a unique community, a sacred communion, one whose quality is incomparably more sublime than that of any natural community. The authentic we communion of the faithful, which the liturgy of Holy Thursday expresses so well in the words congregavit nos in unum Christi amor, is only possible as a fruit of the I-Thou communion with Christ Himself. Only a direct relation to the God-Man can actualize this sacred union among the faithful.

The depersonalizing "we experience" is a perverse theory of community.

The communion in Christ has nothing of the self-assertion found in natural communities. It breathes of the Redemption. It liberates men from all self-centeredness. Yet such a communion emphatically does not depersonalize the individual; far from dissolving the person into the cosmic, pantheistic swoon so often commended to us these days, it actualizes the person's true self in a unique way. In the community of Christ the conflict between person and community that is present in all natural communities cannot exist. So this sacred community experience is really at war with the depersonalizing 'we-experience" found in mass assemblies and popular gatherings which tend to absorb and evaporate the individual. This communion in Christ that was so fully alive in the early Christian centuries, that all the saints entered into, that found a matchless expression in the liturgy now under attack-this communion has never regarded the individual person as a mere segment of the community, or as an instrument to serve it. In this connection it is worth noting that totalitarian ideology is not alone in sacrificing the individual to the collective; some of Teilhard de Chardin's cosmic ideas, for instance, imply the same collectivistic sacrifice. Teilhard subordinates the individual and his sanctification to the supposed development of humanity. At a time when this perverse theory of community is embraced even by many Catholics, there are plainly urgent reasons for vigorously insisting on the sacred character of the true communion in Christ. I submit that the new liturgy must be judged by this test: Does it contribute to the authentic sacred community? Granted that it strives for a community character; but is this the character desired? Is it a communion grounded in recollection, contemplation and reverence? Which of the two -- the new mass, or the Latin mass with the Gregorian chant evokes these attitudes of soul more effectively, and thus permits the deeper and truer communion? Is it not plain that frequently the community character of the new mass is purely profane, that, as with other social gatherings, its blend of casual relaxation and bustling activity precludes a reverent, contemplative confrontation with Christ and with the ineffable mystery of the Eucharist?

OF COURSE OUR EPOCH is pervaded by a spirit of irreverence. It is seen in a distorted notion of freedom that demands rights while refusing obligations, that exalts self-indulgence, that counsels "let yourself go." The habitare secuni of St. Gregory's Dialogues-the dwelling in the presence of God-which presupposes reverence, is considered today to be unnatural, pompous, or servile. But is not the new liturgy a compromise with this modern spirit? Whence comes the disparagement of kneeling? Why should the Eucharist be received standing? Is not kneeling, in our culture, the classic expression of adoring reverence? The argument that at a meal we should stand rather than kneel is hardly convincing. For one thing, this is not the natural posture for eating: we sit, and in Christ's time one lay down. But more important, it is a specifically irreverent conception of the Eucharist to stress its character as a meal at the cost of its unique character as a holy mystery. Stressing the meal at the expense of the sacrament surely betrays a tendency to obscure the sacredness of the sacrifice. This tendency is apparently traceable to the unfortunate belief that religious life will become more vivid, more existential, if it is immersed in our everyday life. But this is to run the danger of absorbing the religious in the mundane, of effacing the difference between the supernatural and the natural. I fear that it represents an unconscious intrusion of the naturalistic spirit, of the spirit more fully expressed in Teilhard de Chardin's immanentism.

Again, why has the genuflection at the words et incarnatus est in the Credo been abolished? Was this not a noble and beautiful expression of adoring reverence while professing the searing mystery of the Incarnation? Whatever the intention of the innovators, they have certainly created the danger, if only psychological, of diminishing the faithful's awareness and awe of the mystery. There is yet another reason for hesitating to make changes in the liturgythat are not strictly necessary. Frivolous or arbitrary changes are apt to erode a special type of reverence: pie tas. The Latin word, like the German Pietaet, has no English equivalent, but may be understood as comprising respect for tradition; honoring what has been handed down to us by former generations; fidelity to our ancestors and their works. Note that pietas is a derivative type of reverence, and so should not be confused with primary reverence, which we have described as a response to the very mystery of being, and ultimately a response to God. It follows that if the content of a given tradition does not correspond to the object of the primary reverence, it does not deserve the derivative reverence. Thus if a tradition embodies evil elements, such as the sacrifice of human beings in the cult of the Aztecs, then those elements should not be regarded with pietas. But that is not the Christian case. Those who idolize our epoch, who thrill at what is modern simply because it is modern, who believe that in our day man has finally "come of age," lack pietas. The pride of these "temporal nationalists" is not only irreverent, it is incompatible with real faith. A Catholic should regard his liturgy. with pietas. He should revere, and therefore fear to abandon the prayers and postures and music that have been approved by so many saints throughout the Christian era and delivered to us as a precious heritage. To go no further: the illusion that we can replace the Gregorian chant, with its inspired hymns and rhythms, by equally fine, if not better, music betrays a ridiculous self-assurance and lack of self-knowledge. Let us not forget that throughout Christianity's history. silence and solitude, contemplation and recollection, have been considered necessary to achieve a real confrontation with God. This is not only the counsel of the Christian tradition, which should be respected out of pietas; it is rooted in human nature. Recollection is the necessary basis for true communion in much the same way as contemplation provides the necessary basis for true action in the vineyard of the Lord. A superficial type of communion -the jovial comradeship of a social affair -- draws us out onto the periphery. A truly Christian communion draws us into the spiritual deeps.

The path to a true Christian communion: Reverence.. Recollection.. Contemplation

Of course we should deplore excessively individualistic and sentimental devotionalism, and acknowledge that many Catholics have practiced it. But the antidote is not a community experience as such-any more than the cure for pseudo-contemplation is activity as such. The antidote is to encourage true reverence, an attitude of authentic recollection and contemplative devotion to Christ. Out of this attitude alone can a true communion in Christ take place. The fundamental laws of the religious life that govern the imitation of Christ, the transformation in Christ, do not change according to the moods and habits of the historical moment. The difference between a superficial community experience and a profound community experience is always the same. Recollection and contemplative adoration of Christ-which only reverence makes possible-will be the necessary basis for a true communion with others in Christ in every era of human history.